Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MICHAEL MARTINEZ

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MICHAEL MARTINEZ in 650 BALD HILL RD., WARWICK, RI 02886 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 347641847.

Watch Michael Martinez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Michael Martinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MICHAEL MARTINEZ
Site address
650 BALD HILL RD.
City
WARWICK
State
RI
ZIP
02886
Mailing
8950 CITY VIEW DR., TYLER, TX 75708
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated.  (a) Establishment: As of March 11, 2025, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement had been completed for Citation 2 item 1 from inspection number 1764184, issued on 11/8/2024, with a final order date of 12/17/2024.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  (a) Establishment: As of March 11, 2025, the employer had not provided the required abatement documentation to OSHA for Citation 2 item 1 from inspection number 1764184, issued on 11/8/2024, with a final order date of 12/17/2024.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.    (a) West side of the building: On or about 7/25/2024, employees were exposed to fall hazards while working from an aerial boom lift without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.454 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $388.00 · Current $388.00
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.   (a) West side of the building: On or about 7/25/2024, the employer did not provide fall protection training to employees exposed to fall hazards while working from a JLG aerial lift.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $388

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347641847.