Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JMY CONSTRUCTION INC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of JMY CONSTRUCTION INC in 715 MAPLE STREET, MANCHESTER, NH 03101 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347646010.

Watch JMY Construction INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JMY Construction INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
715 MAPLE STREET
City
MANCHESTER
State
NH
ZIP
03101
Mailing
99 PRINCETON STREET, NORTH CHELMSFORD, MA 01863
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $388.00 · Current $388.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No.1 Item No(s). 1a, 1b, 4, 5a nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent October 21, 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $388

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $388.00 · Current $388.00
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent October 21, 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $388

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  Site- The employer did not develop a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Site- The employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to ensure that it was free from recognizable hazards where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
29 CFR  1926.416(a)(1):The employer permitted employees to work in close proximity to energized, unguarded, and ungrounded electric power circuits that the employee could contact in the course of their work:   Site- Employees installing a tarp with metal grommets at the roof eave were not protected from electric shock where the exposed conductors for the electrical service were not protected from accidental contact.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $4839.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Site- Two employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 20 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4839

1926.502 D15 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(15)(ii): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, and not installed under the supervision of a qualified person.  Site- Employees were not protected from a fall of approximately 20 feet where 2 employees were connected to the same anchor point which was not installed under the supervision of a qualified person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:   Site- An employee working from the garage roof was not protected from striking the ground approximately 10 feet below where there was excessive slack in their personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:   Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.552 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR  1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators:   Site- Employees operating and working near an RGC P225 material ladder hoist were not protected from struck by hazards where the material ladder hoist was operated without bolts and nuts connecting the two splice plates to each section of the ladder hoist.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $3457.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Site- Employees using an aluminum extension ladder to access the pitched roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder did not extend three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3457

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder:  Site- Employees using an aluminum extension ladder to access the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder was erected at a steeper angle than one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347646010.