Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: KLENDA SEAFOOD

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KLENDA SEAFOOD in 104 THADEUS STREET, SOUTH PORTLAND, ME 04106 (NAICS 311710). OSHA activity number 347860827.

Watch Klenda Seafood — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Klenda Seafood is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KLENDA SEAFOOD
Site address
104 THADEUS STREET
City
SOUTH PORTLAND
State
ME
ZIP
04106
Mailing
104 THADEUS STREET, SOUTH PORTLAND, ME 04106
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311710
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C11

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2074.00 · Current $2452.00
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(11) The employer did not ensure that portable ladders used to gain access to an upper landing surface that have side rails that extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface:  Mezzanine Above Office - Employer failed to extend a ladder used to access the mezzanine at least 3 feet above the landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2451.8
  • — Z (S) $2074

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4839.00 · Current $2387.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet or more above a lower level was protected from falling:    Mezzanine - Employees access the mezzanine areas approximately nine feet above the ground to retrieve packing supplies weekly without proper guardrails.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2387.3
  • — Z (S) $4839

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $2420.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  Establishment - An employee was operating a powered industrial truck without completing training or an evaluation from the employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2419.9
  • — Z (S) $3457

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3457.00 · Current $2420.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   Establishment - The employer did not develop a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals such as Rochester Midland Corporation Foam Safe and F-29 sanitizer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2419.9
  • — Z (S) $3457

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals.   Establishment - Spray bottles of Rochester Midland Corporation Foam Safe and F-29 sanitizer did not have proper secondary labels containing minimum information regarding the hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Establishment - Employees were not provided effective information or training regarding the sections of a safety data sheet, labeling requirements, and pictograms prior to working with hazardous chemicals, such as Rochester Midland Corporation Foam Safe and F-29 sanitizer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  Establishment - Employer did not complete a written certification verifying workplace assessment for personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:   Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly in the following instances:  a. Mounted on the wall next to the electrical panels b. Mounted on the wall next to the office door c. On the floor under a small sink next to the office door e. Mounted on a column adjacent to boiling room
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 B02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:   Office - An outlet cover was not provided in the office area at an outlet used to power computers and other equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347860827.