Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

AURORA, CO —

OSHA Inspection: SEVEN HILLS CONSTRUCTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SEVEN HILLS CONSTRUCTION in 2095 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET, AURORA, CO 80012 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 347936411.

Watch Seven Hills Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Seven Hills Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
SEVEN HILLS CONSTRUCTION
Site address
2095 SOUTH POTOMAC STREET
City
AURORA
State
CO
ZIP
80012
Mailing
21200 EAST EL DORADO DRIVE, AURORA, CO 80015

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
238140
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

Citations

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3547.00 · Current $1774.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.451(b)(1):Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  (a) On or about December 12, 2024 and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the fabricated frame scaffold being utilized for masonry work was fully planked to prevent fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1773.5
  • — Z (S) $3547

1926.451 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.451(b)(10): Scaffold components manufactured by different manufacturers were modified in order to intermix them and a competent person did not determine that the resulting scaffold was structurally sound:  (a) On or about December 12, 2024 and times prior, the employer did not determine that scaffold components manufactured by different manufacturers that were intermixed, were structurally sound.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.451(c)(1):Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph:  (a) On or about December 12, 2024 and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the fabricated frame scaffold being utilized to conduct masonry work was restrained from tipping-over by guying or tying.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.451(c)(2)(i):Footings were not level, sound, rigid and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement:  (a) On or about December 12, 2024 and times prior, the employer did not ensure the footings of the fabricated scaffold were level and secured to prevent displacement. Footings were not level and not secured to the mud sills. Several footings had were bent and unstable while workers were working on the scaffold. This condition exposed employees to falls from heights.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.451(f)(3):Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  (a) On or about December 12, 2024 and at times prior, the employer did not ensure the fabricated frame scaffold had been inspected for visible defects by a competent person before use.  Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:  (a) On or about December 12, 2024, and at times prior, the employer exposed its employees to struck-by hazards in that toe boards were not installed to prevent and ensure employees below were protected from tools and materials falling from overhead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3547.00 · Current $1774.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews:  (a) On or about December 12, 2024 and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the fabricated supported scaffold being utilized to conduct masonry work had all guardrails systems installed prior to allowing employees access the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1773.5
  • — Z (S) $3547

1926.1053 B16

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(16):Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired.  (a) On or about December 12, 2024 and times prior, the employer did not ensure that a ladder used for access to upper levels of a scaffold with bent cleats was marked as defective or tagged or removed from service until
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)

More inspections in CO

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347936411.