Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DINO VARGAS; NINO'S CONSTRUCTION LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DINO VARGAS; NINO'S CONSTRUCTION LLC in 4000 BEDFORD AVE, HAMILTON, OH 45015 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347985590.

Watch Dino Vargas; Nino'S Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dino Vargas; Nino'S Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4000 BEDFORD AVE
City
HAMILTON
State
OH
ZIP
45015
Mailing
119 DEEDS AVENU, DAYTON, OH 45404
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $3476.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): Accident prevention responsibilities. Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.  a) On or about January 17, 2025, the employer did not conduct adequate inspections of the job site. As a result, employees were exposed to fall heights greater than 9 ft in that fall protection was not being utilized while performing roofing work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3475.5
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $9930.00 · Current $6951.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a) On or before January 17, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that employees performing roofing on a residential home were utilizing a fall protection system. As a result, employees were exposed to fall heights greater than 9 ft.  Nino Vargas was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1798559, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on January 13, 2025, with respect to a workplace located at 3929 SR-503 Hamilton, OH 45013.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $6951
  • — Z (R) $9930

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347985590.