OSHA Inspection: CARLOS CAO CAO

Issued

2025-02-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4256.00 · Current $4256.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   a)  At  3132 Silver Maple Road, Lot 22H Reserve at Brookhaven, Cantonment, Florida:  On February 4, 2025; the employer allowed his employees to perform roofing activity without first training his employees on the hazards associated with falls to include but not limited to setting up and inspecting fall protection exposing his employee to a fall hazard of 11 feet 8 inches to the ground below.

Issued

2025-02-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a)  At  3132 Silver Maple Road, Lot 22H Reserve at Brookhaven, Cantonment, Florida:  On February 4, 2025; the employer allowed his employees to perform roofing activity without fall protection exposing his employee to a fall hazard of 11 feet 8 inches to the ground below.

Issued

2025-02-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a)  At  3132 Silver Maple Road, Lot 22H Reserve at Brookhaven, Cantonment, Florida:  On February 4, 2025; the employer allowed his employees to use an extension ladder to gain access to the roof and the rails of the ladder did not extend three feet above the roof landing exposing his employee to a fall hazard of 11 feet 8 inches to the ground below.