Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

EAST WINDSOR, CT —

OSHA Inspection: SERVPRO OF THE WINDSORS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SERVPRO OF THE WINDSORS in 22 THOMPSON ROAD, EAST WINDSOR, CT 06088 (NAICS 562910). OSHA activity number 348067828.

Watch Servpro OF THE Windsors — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Servpro OF THE Windsors is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
SERVPRO OF THE WINDSORS
Site address
22 THOMPSON ROAD
City
EAST WINDSOR
State
CT
ZIP
06088
Mailing
22 THOMPSON ROAD, EAST WINDSOR, CT 06088

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
562910
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

Citations

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $1419.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) SERVPRO of the Windsors; On or about February 26, 2025, and at times prior, the employer develop and implement a written respiratory protection program.  Employees were required to wear respiratory protection while conducting restoration and cleanup services.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1418.5
  • — Z (S) $2837

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) SERVPRO of the Windsors; On or about February 26, 2025, and at times prior, employees were exposed to potential negative health effects from wearing a half-face and full-face tight-fitting respirators when the employer did not ensure that all employees who were required to wear respirators while conducting normal job operations were medically evaluated prior to use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2):Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) SERVPRO of the Windsors; On or about February 26, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that all employees who were required to wear a tight-fitting respirator while conducting normal job operations, such as restoring and cleaning up damaged homes, were given a fit test prior to initial use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562910)

More inspections in CT

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348067828.