Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: KARTEL ROOFING, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KARTEL ROOFING, LLC in W25179 STATE ROAD 54/35, TREMPEALEAU, WI 54661 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348068677.

Watch Kartel Roofing, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kartel Roofing, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KARTEL ROOFING, LLC
Site address
W25179 STATE ROAD 54/35
City
TREMPEALEAU
State
WI
ZIP
54661
Mailing
2620 UNIVERSITY AVE., APT 3., GREEN BAY, WI 54311
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a) Citation 1 Item 1; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1) with an abatement date of April 8, 2025.  (b) Citation 1 Item 2b; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) with an abatement date of April 22, 2025.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:   (a) Citation 1 Item 2b; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1) with an abatement date of April 22, 2025.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2128.00 · Current $2128.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors or potentially injurious light radiation:  (a) Roof of residential garage; On or about February 24, 2025, eye protection was not worn to protect against hazards created from flying particles/debris while pneumatic nail guns were used to install asphalt shingles.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2128

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  (a) Roof of residential garage; On or about February 24, 2025, fall protection systems were not used during reroofing operations at heights ranging from 9 feet, 3 inches to 15 feet, 5 inches above the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify fall protection training by preparing a written certification record:  (a) Roof of residential garage; On or about February 24, 2025, and dates prior, a written record was not developed to document that fall protection training was provided to each worker before they were exposed to potential fall hazards while performing elevated roofing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  (a) Roof of residential garage; On or about February 24, 2025, the side rails of an aluminum ladder did not extend at least 3 feet past the roof edge (upper landing surface).  The ladder was leaned up against the eave and only extended 2 feet above the upper landing.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348068677.