Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

PAGO PAGO, AS —

OSHA Inspection: WORLD PACIFIC INC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WORLD PACIFIC INC in GATE 3 STARKIST TUNA FACTORY, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799 (NAICS 236210). OSHA activity number 348074089.

Watch World Pacific INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for World Pacific INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
WORLD PACIFIC INC
Site address
GATE 3 STARKIST TUNA FACTORY
City
PAGO PAGO
State
AS
ZIP
96799
Mailing
P.O. BOX 1954, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
236210
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

Citations

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 D11

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4729.00 · Current $3310.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.502(d)(11): Lifelines were not protected against being cut or abraded:   On the roof above Gate 3: The polypropylene rope used as a lifeline was connected directly to the rough metal brackets of the roof.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3310.3
  • — Z (S) $4729

1926.502 D08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(8): Horizontal lifelines were not designed, installed, and used under the supervision of a qualified person, as part of a complete personal fall arrest system, which maintained a safety factor of at least two:  On the roof above Gate 3:  Employees were connected to one polypropylene lifeline that was anchored horizontally that was not strong enough for use as fall protection.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person.  On the roof, above Gate 3: Employees were tied off to two nonstructural roof brackets that were not designed as fall arrest anchorages.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head:  On the roof, above Gate 3:  The dorsal D-ring, or the attachment point of the employee's body harness, was not near shoulder level and was located mid-back on the employee.  The employee was exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236210)

More inspections in AS

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348074089.