Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JEFCOAT FENCE COMPANY, INC. OF HATTIESBURG

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of JEFCOAT FENCE COMPANY, INC. OF HATTIESBURG in 5268 HIGHWAY 42, HATTIESBURG, MS 39401 (NAICS 332323). OSHA activity number 348144809.

Watch Jefcoat Fence Company, INC. OF Hattiesburg — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jefcoat Fence Company, INC. OF Hattiesburg is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5268 HIGHWAY 42
City
HATTIESBURG
State
MS
ZIP
39401
Mailing
P O BOX 16628, HATTIESBURG, MS 39401
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332323
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2412.00 · Current $1447.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) Facility - On or about March 27, 2025, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear 3M half face series respirator, exposing employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1447.2
  • — Z (S) $2412

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   a) Facility - On or about March 27, 2025, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for Technicians using a 3M half-face series respirator, exposing the employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece was used, and at least annually thereafter:     a) Facility - On or about March 27, 2025, the employer did not ensure that technicians who weld and paint were fit tested before using a 3M half face series respirator, exposing employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable, and effective annual training to employees who were required to use respirators.    a) Facility-On or about March 27, 2025, the employer did not provide respiratory training to technicians who are required to wear a 3m half-face respirator while welding and painting, exposing technicians to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  (a)  On or about March 27, 2025, the employer did not certify that a hazard assessment for the required personal protective equipment had been performed, exposing employees to eye, face, hand, and health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement and maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g) and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:  (a) Facility - On or about March 27, 2025, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program governing the usage of chemicals in the facility, such as but not limited to Propane, KRYLON industrial TOUGH COAT Sandable Primer, KRYLON industrial TOUGH COAT Acrylic Enamel Paint , and etc., exposing employees to hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348144809.