Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SRJ CONSTRUCTION LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SRJ CONSTRUCTION LLC in 19 WILLIAMS ST., WILLIAMSBURG, MA 01096 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348177494.

Watch SRJ Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SRJ Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
19 WILLIAMS ST.
City
WILLIAMSBURG
State
MA
ZIP
01096
Mailing
259 ORANGE ST., SPRINGFIELD, MA 01108
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  As of January 16, 2026, the employer had not provided abatement certification for Inspection number 1817749, which was issued on August 4, 2025, and required abatement certification for Citation 1, Items 4a and 4b, which was due on September 19, 2025, with respect to a work location at 19 Williams Street, Williamsburg, MA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   As of January 16, 2026, the employer had not provided abatement documentation for Inspection number 1817749, which was issued on August 4, 2025, and required abatement documentation for Citation 1, Items 4a and 4b, which was due on September 19, 2025, with respect to a work location at 19 Williams Street, Williamsburg, MA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.451 E08

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3972.00 · Current $3972.00
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(8): Direct access to or from another surface was used when the scaffold was more than 14 inches (36 cm) horizontally and/or 24 inches (61 cm) vertically from the other surface:  19 Williams St. Williamsburg, MA: On or about April 11, 2025, three employees used a scaffold system to reach a residential rooftop where the upper platform was approximately 37 inches below the roof surface, exposing them to fall hazards between 11 and 14 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3972.00 · Current $3972.00
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  19 Williams St. Williamsburg, MA: On or about April 11, 2025, the employer did not ensure that a supported scaffolding system was inspected prior to use by three employees using the scaffolding to access a residential rooftop to perform shingle replacement and exposed to fall heights of approximately 14.2 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  19 Williams St. Williamsburg, MA: On or about April 11, 2025, the employer did not ensure employees using a scaffolding system to access a residential rooftop had been trained to use scaffolding, exposing them to fall hazards of approximately 11 feet while performing shingle replacement work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3972.00 · Current $3972.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  19 Williams St. Williamsburg, MA: On or about April 11, 2025, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from falls hazards of 14.2 feet while working on residential rooftop during a construction project that included shingle replacement.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3972.00 · Current $3972.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  19 Williams St. Williamsburg, MA: On or about April 11, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees were trained in fall protection prior to working at heights of approximately 14.2 feet during a residential construction project.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  19 Williams St. Williamsburg, MA: On or about April 11, 2025, the employer had not prepared a written certification record of fall protection training which included the name or other identity of the person trained, the signature of the person trained, date(s) the training was completed and the signature of the person who conducted the training for employees who were performing work on a multi-level, residential rooftop, and exposed to fall hazards of 14.2 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348177494.