FRANKLIN, WI —
OSHA Inspection: MARTIN TOVAR
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARTIN TOVAR in 4395 WEST FOREST HILL AVENUE, FRANKLIN, WI 53132 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348183302.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARTIN TOVAR
- Site address
- 4395 WEST FOREST HILL AVENUE
- City
- FRANKLIN
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53132
- Mailing
- 1133 S. 9TH STREET, MILWAUKEE, WI 53204
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: (a) Citation 1, Item 1, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2) with an abatement date of June 6, 2025. (b) Citation 1, Item 2, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.100(a) with an abatement date of June 6, 2025. (c) Citation 1, Item 4, a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3) with an abatement date of June 6, 2025.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $398
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2128.00 · Current $2128.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s). (a) On or about April 16, 2025, the employer had not ensured frequent and regular inspections of the job site were conducted by a competent person to ensure hazardous conditions were found and corrected.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2128
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns. (a) On or about April 16, 2025, an employee performing clean up underneath overhead work was exposed to struck-by hazards from roofing material and tooling.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). (a) On or about April 16, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees installing drip edges on a two-story residential property with a 8:12 pitch were protected from falling to the lower level, exposing employees to a fall hazard of up to approximately 15 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.503 C03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3547.00 · Current $3547.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill. (a) On or about April 16, 2025, the employer had not retrained and verified employees understood the proper methods of installing and utilizing fall protection equipment/systems. Exposing employees to fall hazards up to approximately 15 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3547
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. (a) On or about April 16, 2025, the employer did not ensure that ladders used to access and egress the two-story residential property with a 8:12 pitch were extended at least three feet above the upper landing or secured to prevent displacement when used. Exposing employees to a fall hazard of up to 14.5 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in WI
WAUSAU, WI—2026-07-16
MIRON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
ELROY, WI—2026-07-15
WABASH NATIONAL SERVICES, L.P.
SUSSEX, WI—2026-07-15
KINGS SUPERIOR CONSTRUCTION LLC
DELAVAN, WI—2026-07-15
TERONOMY BUILDERS, INC.
DELAVAN, WI—2026-07-15
A. GOMEZ CARPENTRY, INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348183302.