Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: ERIC R AUBIN

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ERIC R AUBIN in 34 DEER WOOD DR., LITCHFIELD, NH 03052 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348201807.

Watch Eric R Aubin — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eric R Aubin is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ERIC R AUBIN
Site address
34 DEER WOOD DR.
City
LITCHFIELD
State
NH
ZIP
03052
Mailing
9 LAWRENCE RD, HUDSON, NH 03051
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No.1 Item No(s). 4 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent September 8, 2025.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 1a, 1b, 2, 3a, 3b, 3c nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent September 8, 2025.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  a. Site - Employees performing roofing work from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from falls of approximately 19 feet when fall protection was not used or provided.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.452 K05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.452(k)(5): Ladder jack scaffold platforms were bridged on to another.  a. Site - Employees were exposed to structural integrity issues and fall hazards while working from a ladder jack scaffold which had platforms that overlapped onto each other.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  a. Site - Employees performing roofing work were exposed to falls of approximately 20 feet when fall protection was not used or provided.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3547.00 · Current $3547.00
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  a. Site - Employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working from a scaffold were not provided with adequate training which would allow them to identify and avoid said hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3547

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:  a. Site - Employees who were exposed to fall hazards were not provided with adequate training which would allow them to identify and avoid said hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person:  a. Site - Scaffolding was erected by someone other than a competent person or under the supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3547.00 · Current $3547.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:   a. Site - An aluminum extension ladder being used to gain access to the scaffolding platform was not extended three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3547

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348201807.