Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PINK GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PINK GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 47 PROSPECT STREET, CHESHIRE, MA 01225 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348213695.

Watch Pink General Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pink General Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
47 PROSPECT STREET
City
CHESHIRE
State
MA
ZIP
01225
Mailing
64 PROSPECT STREET APT 2, BROCKTON, MA 02301
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   47 Prospect Street, Cheshire, MA: On or about April 30, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees using pneumatic nail guns were protected from flying particles of work material during a residential construction project that involved shingle replacement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:    47 Prospect Street, Cheshire, MA: On or about April 30, 2025, employees were observed working on a residential structure engaged in roofing activities with unprotected sides and edges greater than 6 feet above the next lower and were not protected by either guard rails, safety net systems or personal fall arrest systems exposing them to fall from height hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   47 Prospect Street, Cheshire, MA: On or about April 30, 2025, the employer had not trained employees who were exposed to fall hazards, while performing work on a roof, to recognize fall hazards and on the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:   47 Prospect Street, Cheshire, MA: On or about April 30, 2025, the employer had not prepared a written certification record of fall protection training which included the name or other identity of the person trained,  the signature of the person trained, date(s) the training was completed and the signature of the person who conducted the training for multiple employees engaged in residential roofing activities and exposed to fall hazards .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3547.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  47 Prospect Street, Cheshire, MA: On or about April 30, 2025, an employee was observed accessing the roof using a ladder on the front of the house that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3547

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348213695.