CHESHIRE, MA —
OSHA Inspection: PINK GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PINK GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 47 PROSPECT STREET, CHESHIRE, MA 01225 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348213695.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PINK GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 47 PROSPECT STREET
- City
- CHESHIRE
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01225
- Mailing
- 64 PROSPECT STREET APT 2, BROCKTON, MA 02301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4965.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: 47 Prospect Street, Cheshire, MA: On or about April 30, 2025, the employer did not ensure that employees using pneumatic nail guns were protected from flying particles of work material during a residential construction project that involved shingle replacement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4965.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: 47 Prospect Street, Cheshire, MA: On or about April 30, 2025, employees were observed working on a residential structure engaged in roofing activities with unprotected sides and edges greater than 6 feet above the next lower and were not protected by either guard rails, safety net systems or personal fall arrest systems exposing them to fall from height hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4965.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: 47 Prospect Street, Cheshire, MA: On or about April 30, 2025, the employer had not trained employees who were exposed to fall hazards, while performing work on a roof, to recognize fall hazards and on the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer: 47 Prospect Street, Cheshire, MA: On or about April 30, 2025, the employer had not prepared a written certification record of fall protection training which included the name or other identity of the person trained, the signature of the person trained, date(s) the training was completed and the signature of the person who conducted the training for multiple employees engaged in residential roofing activities and exposed to fall hazards .
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $3547.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: 47 Prospect Street, Cheshire, MA: On or about April 30, 2025, an employee was observed accessing the roof using a ladder on the front of the house that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3547
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in MA
WORCESTER, MA—2026-07-10
QUINSIGAMOND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
FITCHBURG, MA—2026-07-10
KELLEY WOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
EVERETT, MA—2026-07-10
HORIZON RETAIL CONSTRUCTION INC
NORTON, MA—2026-07-09
DYNAMIC RESIDENTIAL ROOF MARKETING, LLC
NORTON, MA—2026-07-09
LM GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348213695.