Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

MERIDEN, CT —

OSHA Inspection: SOUTH BUILDERS INC

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of SOUTH BUILDERS INC in 406 BEE STREET, MERIDEN, CT 06450 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348231382.

Watch South Builders INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for South Builders INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
SOUTH BUILDERS INC
Site address
406 BEE STREET
City
MERIDEN
State
CT
ZIP
06450
Mailing
103 MORGAN STREET, FALL RIVER, MA 02721

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
238130
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

Citations

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2412.00 · Current $2412.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached:  406 Bee Street, Meriden CT: On or about May 7, 2025, the employer did not ensure the anchorage used for the attachment of personal fall arrest equipment was capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds for the employee working at a height of 8 feet and 5 inches while performing tasks such as (but not limited to) handling and securing trusses.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2412
  • — I (S) $1206
  • — Z (S) $2412

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3972.00 · Current $3972.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:   406 Bee Street, Meriden CT: On or about May 7, 2025, the employer did not ensure the personal fall arrest system was rigged to stop a free fall and prevent contact with the lower level for the employee  performing tasks such as (but not limited to) handling and securing trusses.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $3972
  • — I (S) $1986
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3972.00 · Current $3972.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii).   406 Bee Street, Meriden CT: On or about May 7, 2025, the employer did not ensure the employee exposed to fall hazards over 8 feet was provided with training in the correct procedures for erecting and inspecting fall protection systems, and the nature of the fall hazards for the worker performing tasks such as (but not limited to) handling and securing trusses.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $3972
  • — I (S) $1986
  • — Z (S) $3972

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)

More inspections in CT

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348231382.