Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MEZA CONSTRUCTION L. L. C.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MEZA CONSTRUCTION L. L. C. in 1027 159 AVE, NEW RICHMOND, WI 54017 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348238874.

Watch Meza Construction L. L. C. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Meza Construction L. L. C. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1027 159 AVE
City
NEW RICHMOND
State
WI
ZIP
54017
Mailing
1934 STILLWATER AVE E, SAINT PAUL, MN 55119
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a) Citation 1, Item 1a; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1) with an abatement date of June 9, 2025.  (b) Citation 1, Item 1b; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.454(a) with an abatement date of June 9, 2025.  (c) Citation 1, Item 2a; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) with an abatement date of June 9, 2025.  (d) Citation 1, Item 2b; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) with an abatement date of June 9, 2025.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  (a) Citation 1, Item 2a; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) with an abatement date of June 9, 2025.  (b) Citation 1, Item 2b; a serious violation of 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) with an abatement date of June 9, 2025.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1):   Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in accordance with paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section:     (a) Barndominium west side; On or about May 7, 2025, one or more methods of fall protection was not in place while an employee was elevated on a platform attached to the forks of a SkyTrack 8042 telehandler, that was raised to the west side of the lower roof, at a height approximately 12 feet 6 inches above ground level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  (a) Barndominium west side, telehandler platform; An employee working on a scaffold was not adequately trained to recognize fall hazards and/or the procedures to be followed to minimize fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   (a) Barndominium upper roof; On or about May 7, 2025, one or more methods of fall protection was not in place while employees installed metal paneling, on the west side of the 6:12 pitch upper roof, at heights up to 46 feet above ground level.  (b) Barndominium lower roof; On or about May 7, 2025, one or more methods of fall protection was not in place while employees handled material and accessed/egressed the upper roof, on the west side of the 4:12 pitch lower roof, at a height approximately 12 feet 6 inches above ground level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  (a) Barndominium roof; On or about May 7, 2025, workers exposed to fall hazards were not adequately trained to recognize fall hazards and/or the procedures to be followed to minimize fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348238874.