Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

DUBLIN, GA —

OSHA Inspection: JINTECH ENGINEERING CO., LTD

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JINTECH ENGINEERING CO., LTD in 330 EMERALD PARKWAY, DUBLIN, GA 31021 (NAICS 236210). OSHA activity number 348240797.

Watch Jintech Engineering CO., LTD — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jintech Engineering CO., LTD is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
JINTECH ENGINEERING CO., LTD
Site address
330 EMERALD PARKWAY
City
DUBLIN
State
GA
ZIP
31021
Mailing
330 EMERALD PARKWAY, DUBLIN, GA 31021

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
236210
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

Citations

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $1702.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a).  a) Facility: On or about May 12, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to a health hazard, in that the employer had not established a written respiratory program for employees that were required to wear respirators while welding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1702.2
  • — Z (S) $2837

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a).  a) Facility: On or about May 12, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to a health hazard, in that the employer  did not provide medical evaluations for employees that were required to wear respirators while welding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2):Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirators: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a).  a) Facility: On or about May 12, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to a health hazard, in that the employer did not provide a fit test for employees that were required to wear respirators while welding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.134(k)(3):Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a).  a) Facility: On or about May 12, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to a health hazard, in that the employer  did not provide training to employees that were required to wear respirators while welding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $1702.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.  a) Facility: On or about May 12, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer did not to develop and implement a written hazard communication program to include the provisions of paragraphs (f), (g) and (h), for hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, Argon Compressed Gas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1702.2
  • — Z (S) $2837

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use.  a) Facility: On or about May 12, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to a health hazard, in that a safety data sheet was not available for each hazardous chemical, including but not limited to, Argon Compressed Gas used for welding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.  a) Facility: On or about May 12, 2025, and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to a health hazard, in that training was not provided on hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to, Argon Compressed Gas used for welding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236210)

More inspections in GA

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348240797.