Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

MILTON, GA —

OSHA Inspection: PNM CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PNM CONSTRUCTION in 124-50 CHARLOTTE DRIVE, MILTON, GA 30004 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 348250473.

Watch PNM Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for PNM Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
PNM CONSTRUCTION
Site address
124-50 CHARLOTTE DRIVE
City
MILTON
State
GA
ZIP
30004
Mailing
3560 SHRELAND STREET, BUFORD, GA 30518

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
238170
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

Citations

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3405.00 · Current $2043.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a) 12450 Charlotte Drive; Milton, GA: On or about May 14, 2025, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to eye injury hazards, in that the employer did not provide eye protection to employees operating saws to cut siding for installation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2043
  • — Z (S) $3405

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3972.00 · Current $2383.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501   a) Roof: On or about May 14, 2025, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that the employer did not ensure that employees were wearing fall protection while working on a roof over 25 feet installing siding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2383.2
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3405.00 · Current $2043.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) Roof: On or about May 14, 2025, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that employees were working at heights over 25 feet without fall protection and did not receive fall protection training to recognize fall hazards or the procedures to follow for mitigating them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2043
  • — Z (S) $3405

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2838.00 · Current $1703.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(16):Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired.  a) 12450 Charlotte Drive; Milton, GA: On or about May 14, 2025, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that employees were using extension ladders with damaged foot pads to access the roof to install siding without the ladders being withdrawn from service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1702.8
  • — Z (S) $2838

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)

More inspections in GA

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348250473.