DECATUR, IL —
OSHA Inspection: CENTURION INDUSTRIES, INC. DBA A-LERT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CENTURION INDUSTRIES, INC. DBA A-LERT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES in 4050 N BEARSDALE RD, DECATUR, IL 62526 (NAICS 238290). OSHA activity number 348250689.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Site address
- 4050 N BEARSDALE RD
- City
- DECATUR
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62526
- Mailing
- 1107 N. TAYLOR ROAD, GARRETT, IN 46738
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238290
- Employees
- 137
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1026 D02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $16550.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i): The employer using the scheduled monitoring option did not perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure to chromium (VI) for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area: On or about June 6, 2025, an employee was exposed to Chromium (VI) while MIG welding the interior of a stainless steel vessel using stainless steel core in a confined space and the employer did not determine the 8-hour time weighted average exposure to Chromium (VI).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $16550
1910.1026 I04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $14187.00 · Current $14187.00
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(i)(4)(i): Employees were allowed to consume food or beverages at a worksite where chromium (VI) was present; however, the employer did not ensure that the eating and drinking areas were maintained as free as practicable of chromium (VI): On or about May 15, 2025, the employer did not ensure that break room surfaces were maintained as free as practicable from chromium (VI): a. Wipe sample taken on table #1 in employee break room showed Chromium (VI) exposure of 0.125 micrograms per 100cm2. b. Wipe sample taken on table #2 in employee break room showed Chromium (VI) exposure of 0.307 micrograms per 100cm2. c. Wipe sample taken on microwave open door latch in employee break room showed Chromium (VI) exposure of 0.142 micrograms per 100cm2.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $14187
- — Z (S) $14187
1910.1026 I04 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(i)(4)(ii): Employees were allowed to consume food or beverages at a worksite where chromium (VI) was present; however, the employer did not ensure that employees did not enter the eating and drinking areas with chromium (VI)-contaminated protective clothing or equipment: On or about May 15, 2025, the employer did not ensure employees with contaminated PPE were not allowed into areas where eating and drinking occurred.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1026 K01 I A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $9457.00 · Current $9457.00
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(k)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not make medical surveillance available for all employees who were or could be occupationally exposed to chromium (VI) at or above the action level for 30 or more days a year: On or about June 6, 2025, and times prior, employees conducting welding operations on stainless steel in the fabrication area were exposed to an airborne concentration to chromium (VI) at an 8-hour time weighed average (TWA) of 3.7 micrograms/cubic meter (�g/m�) of Chromium (VI), above the OSHA action level of 2.5 micrograms/cubic meter (�g/m�). The exposure level was derived from samples collected over a 450-minute sampling period, with zero exposure assumed for the period of 30 minutes, sampling conducted on June 6, 2025, and employees were not provided the opportunity for medical surveillance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $9457
- — Z (S) $9457
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about May 15, 2025, and times prior, an employee was not provided a medical evaluation prior to being required to wear a 3M Adflo Power Air Purifying Respirator (PAPR) hood respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238290)
PRESTONSBURG, KY—2026-06-23
69242 - R - H CONTRACTING LLC
FONTANA, CA—2026-06-18
MOBILE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES
LE ROY, NY—2026-06-17
CHUCK MCLAUGHLIN LLC
AURORA, IL—2026-06-10
PEPPER CONSTRUCTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UT—2026-06-04
SOLID CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC
More inspections in IL
DEERFIELD, IL—2026-07-16
JOHN BURNS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
BUILDER SERVICES GROUP, INC. DBA CJ INSULATION
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
HIGHLAND PARK, IL—2026-07-16
UNITED PLUMBING AND DRAIN, INC.
FRANKLIN PARK, IL—2026-07-16
B & M PLASTIC INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348250689.