ORLANDO, FL —
OSHA Inspection: JSJ CONSTRUCTION INC
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of JSJ CONSTRUCTION INC in 1233 SAND LAKE RD., ORLANDO, FL 32809 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 348293010.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JSJ CONSTRUCTION INC
- Site address
- 1233 SAND LAKE RD.
- City
- ORLANDO
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32809
- Mailing
- 6153 RHYTHM CIR., ORLANDO, FL 32808
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a. On or about 8/25/2025, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citation 1, item 3 group C, issued on 7/21/2025, with an abatement due date of 8/14/2025.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $398
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns. a) On or about June 3, 2025, at the jobsite: employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while applying stucco from a scaffold that was not equipped with toe boards, in that, head protection was not used.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units, and the space between the platform and the uprights is no. a) On or about June 3, 2025, at the jobsite: employees were exposed to an approximate 14 foot fall hazard while applying stucco from a scaffold that was not fully planked.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1):When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Cross braces were used as a means of access. a) On or about June 3, 2025, at the jobsite: employees were exposed to a 14 foot fall hazard while climbing the scaffold frame, in that, safe access was not provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2837
1926.451 H02 II
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:Note: This requirement does not apply to float (ship) scaffolds where an edging of 3/4 inch x 1 1/2 inch (2 x 4 cm) wood or equivalent was used in lieu of toeboards. a) On or about June 3, 2025, at the jobsite: employees were exposed to struck by hazards while applying stucco from a scaffold that was not equipped with toeboards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. a) On or about June 3, 2025, at the jobsite: employees were exposed to 14 foot fall hazards and struck by hazards while applying stucco from a scaffold that has missing guardrails, toe boards, and lack of safe access, in that, scaffold training was not provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms. a) On or about June 3, 2025, at the jobsite: employees were exposed to an approximate 14 foot fall hazard while applying stucco from a scaffold that had missing guardrails on the open sides.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4965
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
BUILDER SERVICES GROUP, INC. DBA CJ INSULATION
NAMPA, ID—2026-07-15
INTERIOR SYSTEMS, INC.
BRIDGEPORT, WV—2026-07-14
EASLEY & RIVERS, INC.
ELLETTSVILLE, IN—2026-07-13
ENVIRO HEAT, LLC
ELLETTSVILLE, IN—2026-07-13
RWS INSULATION SERVICES, LLC
More inspections in FL
MARIANNA, FL—2026-07-16
BRANNON BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
LAKELAND, FL—2026-07-16
SOUTHERN MILLING & LUMBER, INC.
OAKLAND PARK, FL—2026-07-16
PKB CABINETRY
LAKELAND, FL—2026-07-16
ELIJAH WHOLESALE, LLC.
TAMPA, FL—2026-07-16
VALENCIA WHOLESALE, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348293010.