Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JORGE CAZLEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JORGE CAZLEZ in 5480 WHITE PINE DR, HAMILTON, OH 45011 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348293044.

Watch Jorge Cazlez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jorge Cazlez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JORGE CAZLEZ
Site address
5480 WHITE PINE DR
City
HAMILTON
State
OH
ZIP
45011
Mailing
4 HORIZON CT, FAIRFIELD, OH 45014
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a) On or before June 3, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that employees performing roofing on a garage of a residential home were utilizing a personal fall arrest system. Employees were exposed to fall heights greater than 21 ft.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  a) On or about June 3, 2025, the employer failed to ensure that each employee exposed to a fall hazard was trained on the hazards of falling and the procedures to minimize the hazards in the work area. Employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 21 feet while performing residential roofing work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.1053 B15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2837.00 · Current $2837.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(15):Ladders shall be inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after any occurrence that could affect their safe use.  a) On June 3, 2025, the employer did not ensure that a portable extension ladder was adequately inspected prior to use in that the ladder employees were using had damaged bent rungs.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2837

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(16):Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, shall either be immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or be tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and shall be withdrawn from service until repaired.  a) On June 3, 2025, the employer did not ensure that a damaged portable extension ladder was removed from service in that the ladder employees were using had damaged bent rungs.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348293044.