NEW BEDFORD, MA —
OSHA Inspection: SOUTH COAST LAUNDRY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SOUTH COAST LAUNDRY, INC. in 2112 ACUSHNET AVE, NEW BEDFORD, MA 02745 (NAICS 812320). OSHA activity number 348308644.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SOUTH COAST LAUNDRY, INC.
- Site address
- 2112 ACUSHNET AVE
- City
- NEW BEDFORD
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02745
- Mailing
- 2112 ACUSHNET AVE, NEW BEDFORD, MA 02745
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 812320
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 D02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4502.00 · Current $2251.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(2): Exit route doors were not free of a device or alarm that could restrict emergency use of the exit route if the device or alarm fails: Laundry Area: The following exit route doors were equipped with interior thumb locks that were not in good working order and restricted the emergency use of the exit route doors: a) Cart Storage Room - the thumb lock of the exit route door was jammed in the locked position. b) Laundry Room - the thumb lock of the side exit route door was difficult to open consistently and required multiple attempts. c) Laundry Room Main Employee Entrance to rear of building - the thumb lock of the exit route door was difficult to open because the door jamb did not align correctly with the thumb lock.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2251
- — Z (S) $4502
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet): Main Laundry Room: The following doors were not identified by a sign indicating its actual use: a) A door that provided access to the posterior section of the commercial dryers was not identified by a sign "Not An Exit" or a description of its actual use. b) An overhead door was improperly marked by a lighted exit sign.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4502.00 · Current $2251.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): Establishment and Laundry Area: Employer did not provide and require the use of chemical resistant gloves, and personal eye/face protection for employees who used and were exposed to corrosive chemical products such as Premium Built Laundry Detergent (sodium hydroxide), Liquid Lo-Hi laundry detergent (sodium metasilicate, nonylphenol ethoxylate), and Chlorox Bleach (sodium hypochlorite) for laundering clothing, linens and rugs, and housekeeping.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2251
- — Z (S) $4502
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: Establishment - Laundry Area: Employer did not provide suitable flushing facilities for eyes/body for employees who used corrosive laundry products and housekeeping cleaning products such as Premium Built Laundry Detergent (sodium hydroxide), Liquid Lo-Hi laundry detergent (sodium metasilicate), and Chlorox Bleach (sodium hypochlorite) to launder clothing, linens and rugs, and perform housekeeping.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3376.00 · Current $1688.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): Employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: Laundry Area, Delivery Trucks and Pickup Sites: The employer did not develop and implement an exposure control plan that included a schedule and methods of implementation for 29 CFR 1910.1030(d) methods of compliance to prevent employee exposure while engaging in tasks such as handling of potentially contaminated laundry while delivering and laundering clothing and linens and performing housekeeping to prevent exposure to blood and other potentially infectious materials and contaminated sharp devices.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1688
- — Z (S) $3376
1910.1030 G02 VII
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii): Employer's training program did not contain the minimum elements required by 29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(A) through (g)(2)(vii)(N): Laundry Area, Delivery Trucks and Pickup locations: Employer's training program relating to potential exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials did not include all elements required by this section to prevent employee exposure while engaging in tasks such as handling of potentially contaminated laundry while delivering and laundering clothing/linens and performing housekeeping to prevent exposure to body fluids and contaminated sharp devices. Elements not included in employer's training program included, but was not limited to: a) How to identify tasks that may result in employee exposure. b) Methods to prevent employee exposure. c) Post exposure evaluation and follow-up.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4502.00 · Current $2251.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Laundry Area: Employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program as required by this section including labeling, all safety data sheets, and employee training for employees who use various hazardous commercial laundry, housekeeping and anti-vermin products such as Premium Built Laundry Detergent (sodium hydroxide), Liquid Lo-Hi laundry detergent, Kleen Line Fabric Softener, Chlorox Bleach (sodium hypochlorite), and Hot Shot Bedbug & Flea defogger to launder clothing and linens, perform housekeeping, and vermin prevention.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2251
- — Z (S) $4502
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 812320)
ADJUNTAS, PR—2026-07-09
NICK A VAZQUEZ TORRES
LAUREL, MD—2026-07-08
ZIPS CLEANERS
COLLEGE PARK, MD—2026-07-08
PASHAK CLEANERS LLC
BAYAMON, PR—2026-06-29
EDWARD MORALES MENDEZ
YAUCO, PR—2026-06-29
CUATRO CALLES DRY CLEANERS INC
More inspections in MA
BELLINGHAM, MA—2026-07-16
BELLINGHAM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PLYMOUTH, MA—2026-07-15
TECH-ETCH, INC.
WESTFIELD, MA—2026-07-15
BOISE CASCADE BUILDING MATERIALS DISTRIBUTION, L.L.C.
QUINCY, MA—2026-07-15
UNITEDWOR VM CONTRACTOR CORP
FALL RIVER, MA—2026-07-15
CRESCO LABS, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348308644.