Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JAMIE RODRIGUEZ ROMO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JAMIE RODRIGUEZ ROMO in 6009 PINE BLUFF PLACE LOT #157, CONYERS, GA 30013 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348335449.

Watch Jamie Rodriguez Romo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jamie Rodriguez Romo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6009 PINE BLUFF PLACE LOT #157
City
CONYERS
State
GA
ZIP
30013
Mailing
627 SUMMIT RIDGE COURT, LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30046
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2128.00 · Current $1277.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:   a) Lot #157: On 06/25/2025, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while operating and pneumatic nail guns, in that protective eyewear was not provided while operating these tools at 225 PSI.  b) Lot #157: On 06/25/2025, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while operating circular saws, in that protective eyewear was not provided while operating these tools.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1276.8
  • — Z (S) $2128

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3547.00 · Current $2128.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   a) Lot #157, Roof: On 6/25/2025, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 19-feet, 10-inches from the lower ground level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees while installing plywood sheathing to construct the roof.  b) Lot #157, Second Floor: On 6/25/2025, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 12-feet, 7-inches from the lower ground level, in that a fall protection system while working near a rough opening engaged in framing activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2128.2
  • — Z (S) $3547

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348335449.