BRIDGEPORT, WV —
OSHA Inspection: MHI RJ CR&O
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MHI RJ CR&O in 1 LOGISTICS PARK WAY, BRIDGEPORT, WV 26330 (NAICS 488190). OSHA activity number 348359183.
Watch MHI RJ CR&O — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MHI RJ CR&O is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MHI RJ CR&O
- Site address
- 1 LOGISTICS PARK WAY
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- WV
- ZIP
- 26330
- Mailing
- 1 LOGISTICS PARK WAY, BRIDGEPORT, WV 26330
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 488190
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1026 D02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11823.00 · Current $8500.00 Reduced
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i): The employer did not perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area: (a) Spray and Sand Booths: On 7/16/25 and times prior, the employer did not conduct initial monitoring for employees working with primers containing Hexavalent Chromium. Employee exposure monitoring conducted on 7/16/25 indicated an employee with exposure greater than the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 micrograms per cubic meter of air. Abatement certification and documentation required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, the date and method of abatement, and state that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement. Abatement documentation shall include documents demonstrating that abatement is complete, such as evidence of the purchase or repair of equipment, photograph or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8500
- — Z (S) $11823
1910.1026 F01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(f)(1)(i): Feasible engineering controls and work practices were not instituted to reduce and maintain employee exposures to chromium (VI) at or below the permissible exposure limit: (a) Spray Booth: On 7/16/26, an employee conducting chrome spray painting operations was exposed to an airborne concentration to hexavalent chromium at an 8-hour Time Weighted Average of 11 micrograms per cubic meter of air for the 266 minute sampling period. The employer has not implemented all feasible engineering controls and work practices to achieve compliance with the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 micrograms per cubic meter of air. Abatement certification and documentation required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, the date and method of abatement, and state that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement. Abatement documentation shall include documents demonstrating that abatement is complete, such as evidence of the purchase or repair of equipment, photograph or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1026 D02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i):The employer did not perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area: (a) Spray and Sand Booths: On 7/16/25 and times prior, the employer did not conduct initial monitoring for employees working with primers containing Hexavalent Chromium. Employee exposure monitoring conducted on 7/16/25 indicated an employee with exposure greater than the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 micrograms per cubic meter of air. Abatement certification and documentation required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, the date and method of abatement, and state that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement. Abatement documentation shall include documents demonstrating that abatement is complete, such as evidence of the purchase or repair of equipment, photograph or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1026 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $11823.00 · Current $8500.00 Reduced
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(e)(1):The employer did not establish a regulated area wherever an employee's exposure to airborne concentrations of chromium (VI) was, or could reasonably be expected to be, in excess of the permissible exposure limit: (a) Spray and Sand Booths: On 7/16/25 and times prior the employer did not establish a regulated area for employees that were exposed to hexavalent chromium in excess to the permissible exposure limit. Employee exposure monitoring conducted on 7/16/25 indicated an employee with exposure greater than the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 micrograms per cubic meter of air. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8500
- — Z (S) $11823
1910.1026 E02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(e)(2):The employer did not ensure that a regulated area for chromium (VI) was demarcated from the rest of the workplace in a manner that adequately established and alerted employees of the boundaries of the regulated area: (a) Spray and Sand Booths: On 7/16/25 and times prior the employer did not demarcate a regulated area to alert employees of boundaries where they may be exposed in excess of the chromium (VI) PEL. Employee exposure monitoring conducted on 7/16/25 indicated an employee with exposure greater than the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 micrograms per cubic meter of air. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1026 H01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(h)(1): A hazard was present or was likely to be present from skin or eye contact with chromium (VI); however, the employer did not provide appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment at no cost to employees, and/or did not ensure that employees used such clothing and equipment: (a) Spray and Sand Booths: On 7/16/25 and times prior the employer did not require the use of personal protective clothing where they may be exposed in excess of the chromium (VI) PEL. Employee exposure monitoring conducted on 7/16/25 indicated an employee with exposure greater than the permissible exposure limit of 5.0 micrograms per cubic meter of air. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1026 L02 I
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i):The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to chromium (VI) were provided with information and training as required by the Hazard Communication standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200, the contents of 1910.1026 and the purpose and description of the medical surveillance plan: (a) Spray and Sand Booths: On 7/16/25 and times prior, the employer did not provide hazardous material training to employees working with primers containing Hexavalent Chromium. Employee exposure monitoring and wipe sampling indicated employees exposed Hexavalent Chromium. No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7093.00 · Current $7000.00 Reduced
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: (a) Sand Booths and Floor Stations: On 7/16/25 and times prior, the employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training for employees required to wear respirators. Employee's are required to wear respirators to prevent exposure to Hexavalent Chromium. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7000
- — Z (S) $7093
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) Sand Booths and Floor Stations: On 7/16/25 and times prior, employees were required to wear 3M 8247 R95 respirators while sanding hazardous paint primers containing Strontium Chromate. The employer had not ensured the employee had a medical evaluation prior to the required respirator use. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
0689
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (a) Sand Booths and Floor Stations: On 7/16/25 and times prior, employees were required to wear 3M 8247 R95 respirators while sanding hazardous paint primers containing Strontium Chromate. The employer had not ensured the employee had been fit-tested prior to the required respirator use. Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 488190)
TRAVERSE CITY, MI—2026-07-14
UNIFI AVIATION LLC
VANDALIA, OH—2026-07-08
SIERRA NEVADA CORPORATION
ASPEN, CO—2026-06-17
ATLANTIC AVIATION-MONTROSE LLC
GULF SHORES, AL—2026-06-17
TREGO/DUGAN AVIATION OF GRAND ISLAND, INC.
LOS ANGELES, CA—2026-06-12
UNITED AIRLINES
More inspections in WV
CHARLESTON, WV—2026-07-15
ASTECH CORPORATION
PARKERSBURG, WV—2026-07-15
UNKNOWN
VIENNA, WV—2026-07-15
PHOENIX ASSOCIATES, INC.
BRIDGEPORT, WV—2026-07-14
MID ATLANTIC METALWORKS INC.
BRIDGEPORT, WV—2026-07-14
INFINITY ELECTRIC & SERVICE COMPANY, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348359183.