Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: JOSE MARIA MORALES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE MARIA MORALES in 649 CHESTNUT STREET, NEENAH, WI 54956 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348426180.

Watch Jose Maria Morales — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Maria Morales is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE MARIA MORALES
Site address
649 CHESTNUT STREET
City
NEENAH
State
WI
ZIP
54956
Mailing
1645 E HARDING DRIVE APT 1, APPLETON, WI 54915
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4256.00 · Current $4256.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Residential construction. Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of � 1926.502.  On or about August 7, 2025, at a worksite located at 649 Chestnut Street, Neenah, Wisconsin: employees were exposed to fall hazards of 9 feet 9 inches while conducting reroofing activities on a residential construction site without the use of conventional fall protection.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with � 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4256

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348426180.