WINSLOW, ME —
OSHA Inspection: JACOBS GLASS, INC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of JACOBS GLASS, INC in 5 CUSHMAN ROAD, WINSLOW, ME 04901 (NAICS 238150). OSHA activity number 348464314.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JACOBS GLASS, INC
- Site address
- 5 CUSHMAN ROAD
- City
- WINSLOW
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04901
- Mailing
- PO BOX 212, GARDINER, ME 04345
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238150
- Employees
- 22
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $339.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer failed to certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation had been abated: Worksite - Employer failed to certify abatement for Citation 1 Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6a, 6b, and Citation 2 Items 1, 2, 3, 4.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $339
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3618.00 · Current $2533.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested: Workshop - On or about 8/25/25, the employer did not ensure that employees who were required to use Honeywell 7700 Series half face respirators, while performing work activities that involved handling, sanding and/or scraping lead painted wood surfaces, were provided an annual fit test.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2532.6
- — Z (S) $3618
1910.1025 D07
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3618.00 · Current $2533.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(7): Additional exposure monitoring was not conducted when there was a change in production, process, control or personnel, or any other reason to suspect a change that may have resulted in new or additional exposure to lead: Workshop - Employer did not conduct additional exposure monitoring after changes in personnel who handle, sand, and scrape lead painted windows and doors; were made.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2532.6
- — Z (S) $3618
1910.1025 E04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3015.00 · Current $2111.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(4)(i):When ventilation was used to control exposure to lead, measurements which demonstrate the effectiveness of they system in controlling exposure were not made at least every three months: Workshop - On or about 1/13/26, the employer utilized a mechanical ventilation system to exhaust lead and other airborne contaminants from their sanding and stripping room. The employer did not conduct testing to ensure the effectiveness of the system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2110.5
- — Z (S) $3015
1910.1025 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2412.00 · Current $1688.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: Workshop - On or about 8/25/25, the employer did not ensure that all surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1688.4
- — Z (S) $2412
1910.1025 J02 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3015.00 · Current $2111.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(2)(iv): Each employee whose blood lead level exceeded 40 micrograms per 100 grams of whole blood was not notified in writing within five working days after receipt of such results: Workshop - On or about 8/25/25, the employer did not ensure that employees, whose blood lead levels exceeded 40 micrograms per 100 grams of whole blood, were notified in writing within five working days upon receipt of results.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2110.5
- — Z (S) $3015
1910.1025 L01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3015.00 · Current $2111.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025: Workshop - On or about 8/25/25, the employer did not provide training regarding the health hazards of lead or all the key provisions of the Lead Standard, as required by Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2110.5
- — Z (S) $3015
1910.1025 L01 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(iv):A training program was not repeated at least annually for each employee subject to lead exposure at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation existed: Workshop - On or about 8/25/25, the employer did not ensure that a training program was repeated at least annually for employees who handled, scrapped, and/or sanded lead painted wooden surfaces for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation existed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 N01 II A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(n)(1)(ii)(A): The record of exposure monitoring for lead did not include the date, number, duration, location and results of each of the samples taken and/or a description of the sampling procedure used to determine representative employee exposure: Workshop - On or about 8/25/25, the employer did not ensure that 2016 records of lead exposure monitoring of employees engaged in handling, sanding, and/or scraping of lead painted windows and doors were accurately maintained to include the location of each sample taken.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1025 N01 II C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(n)(1)(ii)(C): The employer's exposure monitoring record did not include the type of respiratory protective devices worn, if any: Workshop - On or about 8/25/25,the employer did not ensure that 2016 records of lead exposure monitoring of employees engaged in handling, sanding, and/or scraping of lead painted windows and/doors were accurately maintained to include the type of respiratory protective devices worn, if any.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1025 N01 II D
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(n)(1)(ii)(D): The employer's exposure monitoring record did not include the social security number of the employee monitored nor did it include the names or social security numbers of all other employees whose exposure the measurement was intended to represent: Workshop - On or about 8/25/25, the employer did not ensure that 2016 records of lead exposure monitoring of employees engaged in handling, sanding, and/or scraping of lead painted windows and/doors were accurately maintained to include the name and job classification of the employee monitored.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1025 N01 II E
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(n)(1)(ii)(E): The employer's exposure monitoring did not include a record of environmental variables that could affect the measurement of employee exposure: Workshop - On or about 8/25/25, the employer did not ensure that 2016 records of lead exposure monitoring of employees engaged in handling, sanding, and/or scraping of lead painted windows and/doors were accurately maintained to include the environmental variables that could affect the measurement of employee exposure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238150)
BRIDGEPORT, WV—2026-07-14
AMERICAN PLATE GLASS, INC.
HARRISBURG, PA—2026-07-02
HERSHOCKS INC
HARRISBURG, PA—2026-07-02
HERSHOCKS INC
HOLLISTER, CA—2026-06-29
PAC CON GLAZING. INC.
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-06-24
ARROWALL COMPANY
More inspections in ME
AUGUSTA, ME—2026-07-14
JJ GONZALEZ ROOFING AND GUTTERS
DOVER FOXCROFT, ME—2026-07-14
REDI-ROCK OF CENTRAL MAINE
PORTLAND, ME—2026-07-06
NEW ENGLAND REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF PORTLAND
DOVER FOXCROFT, ME—2026-07-06
SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS
GORHAM, ME—2026-07-02
TOWN OF GORHAM
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348464314.