Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JULIO MORALES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JULIO MORALES in 3740 PAXTON AVENUE, CINCINNATI, OH 45209 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348530841.

Watch Julio Morales — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Julio Morales is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JULIO MORALES
Site address
3740 PAXTON AVENUE
City
CINCINNATI
State
OH
ZIP
45209
Mailing
1020 SETON AVE, CINCINNATI, OH 45205
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2):Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.  a) On or about 09/28/2025, the employer failed to ensure that a competent person conducted frequent and regular inspections of the job site. At the time of the inspection, at least eight employees were performing roofing activities such as replacing shingles on a steep-slope commercial building without adequate utilization of a fall protection system, and ladders used for roof access did not extend at least three feet above the landing surface. As a result, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet on a roof with a 6/12 pitch
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(11): "Steep roofs." Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.   a) On or about 09/28/2025, the employer did not ensure that employees performing roofing activities such as replacing shingles on a steep-slope commercial building were utilizing a fall protection system. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 12 feet on a slope that was on a 6/12 pitch.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4965.00 · Current $4965.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.  a) On or about 09/28/2025, at 370 Paxton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45209, the employer did not ensure that portable ladders used by employees for roofing activities extended at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface. The ladders were not secured at the top nor equipped with a grasping device, exposing employees to a potential fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4965

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $398.00 · Current $398.00
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1):The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training.  a) On or about 09/28/2025, the employer did not ensure that written certification of training records for fall protection were being maintained in that the employer did not have training records for employees working at 370 Paxton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45209.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $398

View JULIO MORALES's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348530841.