Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DOMUM CONSTRUCTION INC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DOMUM CONSTRUCTION INC in 9 RIVERSIDE STREET, NASHUA, NH 03060 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348541194.

Watch Domum Construction INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Domum Construction INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9 RIVERSIDE STREET
City
NASHUA
State
NH
ZIP
03060
Mailing
3 RIVER PLACE APT 1103, LOWELL, MA 01852
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2838.00 · Current $2838.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  Site- The employer did not develop a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to fall hazards. On or about 10/3/2025 a site supervisor fell approximately 21 feet from the roof and struck the ground while wearing a full body harness and connected to an anchor point.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2838

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Site- The employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to ensure that it was free from recognizable hazards where employees were exposed to fall hazards. On or about 10/3/2025 a site supervisor fell approximately 21 feet from the roof and struck the ground while wearing a full body harness and connected to an anchor point.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   Site- Each employee working from the roof and exposed to a fall hazard while using personal fall arrest equipment was not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2838.00 · Current $2838.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(6)(ii): Snaphooks not designed to be connected to one another were engaged to each other.  Site- A site supervisor working from the roof was not protected from a fall hazard of approximately 21 feet where their personal fall arrest system included the use of a retractable web lanyard and a second web lanyard connected to a rope grab and life line. The two web lanyards where connected to each other by their snap hooks to which they were not designed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2838

1926.502 D15 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(15)(ii): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, and not installed under the supervision of a qualified person.  Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 21 feet where 2 employees were connected to the same anchor point, which was only rated for 1 person; the anchor point was not fastened to the roof utilizing all the required fasteners; and was not installed under the supervision of a qualified person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D21

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service:   Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected to a fall hazard where personal fall arrest systems were not inspected for wear, damage, and other deterioration. The retractable web lanyard used in the supervisors personal fall arrest system was damaged and the locking mechanism did not work, the retractable web lanyard was not removed from service. On or about 10/3/2025 a site supervisor fell approximately 21 feet from the roof and struck the ground while wearing a full body harness and connected to an anchor point.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3972.00 · Current $3972.00
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:   Site- On or about 10/3/2025 a site supervisor fell approximately 21 feet from the roof and struck the ground while wearing a full body harness connected to an anchor point, free falling more than 6 feet due to the slack from their rope grab.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3972

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348541194.