COLORADO SPRINGS, CO —
OSHA Inspection: EPTAM WEST, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of EPTAM WEST, LLC in 615 WOOTEN ROAD SUITE 152, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80915 (NAICS 339112). OSHA activity number 348609926.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EPTAM WEST, LLC
- Site address
- 615 WOOTEN ROAD SUITE 152
- City
- COLORADO SPRINGS
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80915
- Mailing
- 615 WOOTEN ROAD SUITE 152, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80915
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 339112
- Employees
- 142
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $14895.00 · Current $14895.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a) On or about November 21, 2025, and at times prior, machinists were exposed to caught in-between and struck-by hazards while performing maintenance and set up of equipment used during manufacturing operations in that hazardous energy controls procedures were not utilized while conducting such activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $14895
- — Z (S) $14895
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, (c)(4)(ii)[A], (c)(4)(ii)[B], (c)(4)(ii)[C] and (c)(4)(ii)[D]: a) On or about November 21, 2025, and at times prior, machinists were exposed to caught in-between and struck-by hazards while performing maintenance and set up while utilizing the "EPTAM Precision Metals Lock-out Procedures" which were inadequate to inform and protect workers in that the scope, purpose, rules, and means to enforce compliance were not clear, it did not assure that a locked-out condition was achieved, and the procedure did not include the following: 1. The intended use, such as including if the machine should be used for set-up or maintenance and/or other hazardous tasks. 2. Specific procedural steps for electrical isolation of control switches and the hydraulic pump. 3. Specific procedural steps for the application, removal and transfer of locks. 4. A means to verify or test the effectiveness of the isolation and lockout methods.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: a) On or about November 21, 2025, and at times prior, the employer did not conduct any periodic inspections of their lockout/tag-out program to ensure adequate lockout conditions were met.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees and did not include all the training elements listed under Items A-C of 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): a) On or about November 21, 2025, and at times prior, employees were exposed to caught in-between and struck-by hazards created by working inside machines without the benefit of being trained in the responsibilities and hazards of machine servicing, setup, and how to mitigate those hazards by isolating power sources to specific machines. An employee suffered serious bodily injury by performing work inside a machine that was not in an adequate lockout condition.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $14895.00 · Current $14895.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) On or about November 21, 2025, and at times prior, workers were exposed to caught in-between and struck-by hazards while routinely entering the area beyond the protective enclosure doors of metal machining equipment for tasks including part retrieval, cleaning and setup while fully operational and could activate due to operator's panel input and/or equipment malfunction.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $14895
- — Z (S) $14895
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 339112)
PEACHTREE CITY, GA—2026-06-11
GERRESHEIMER PEACHTREE CITY (USA), L.P.
MARSHFIELD, MA—2026-06-11
KIRWAN SURGICAL PRODUCTS LLC
HOUSTON, TX—2026-06-11
ALCON LABORATORIES, INC.
OSSEO, MN—2026-05-27
111319 - BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
DRAPER, UT—2026-05-21
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, LLC
More inspections in CO
BROOMFIELD, CO—2026-07-16
WAVELYNX TECHNOLOGIES LLC
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO—2026-07-15
ELMER CONTRACTOR LLC
SHERIDAN, CO—2026-07-15
JOHN'S COLLISION REPAIR, INC.
CENTENNIAL, CO—2026-07-15
BRAKES PLUS, INC
ENGLEWOOD, CO—2026-07-15
PCL CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348609926.