WOLFEBORO, NH —
OSHA Inspection: TOP BUILDERS PRO CORP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TOP BUILDERS PRO CORP in 18 CENTER STREET, WOLFEBORO, NH 03894 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348822057.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TOP BUILDERS PRO CORP
- Site address
- 18 CENTER STREET
- City
- WOLFEBORO
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03894
- Mailing
- 52 DELARD STREET, LOWELL, MA 01850
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2838 · Current $2000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Site- The employer did not develop a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2838
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): Site- The employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to ensure that it was free from recognizable hazards where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways: Site- Employees exposed to fall and ladder collapse hazards while ascending and descending aluminum extension ladders were not provided with ladder training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2838 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not required to be worn by the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2838
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3972 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 18 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3972
1926.502 D15 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15)(ii): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest systems were not designed, installed and used under the supervision of a qualified person: Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where personal fall arrest systems in use had vertical life lines connected to anchor points with knots and not by the provided snap hook, metal roof anchors were not attached to the roof surface utilizing all the required nail holes, and a qualified person did not supervise the installation and use of the personal fall arrest equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body belt was not located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body narness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head. Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from fall related injuries where the lifelines in their personal fall arrest systems were connected to the employee's full body harness at their waists.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2838 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Site- Employees using aluminum extension ladders to access the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladders extended less than three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2838
1926.1053 B03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(3): Ladders were loaded beyond the maximum intended load for which they are built: Site- Employees using aluminum extension ladders to access the roof were not protected from a ladder failure hazard where three employees descended a single aluminum extension ladder at the same time, exceeding the maximum intended load for the ladder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in NH
CONCORD, NH—2026-07-10
C.C. TOMATOES
FRANCESTOWN, NH—2026-07-10
JM BUILDERS LLC
FRANCESTOWN, NH—2026-07-10
D&D INSULATION, LLC
NORTHFIELD, NH—2026-07-03
JP PEST SERVICES
CONCORD, NH—2026-07-01
REYES CARPENTRY, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348822057.