Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TOP BUILDERS PRO CORP

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TOP BUILDERS PRO CORP in 18 CENTER STREET, WOLFEBORO, NH 03894 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348822057.

Watch TOP Builders PRO Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for TOP Builders PRO Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
18 CENTER STREET
City
WOLFEBORO
State
NH
ZIP
03894
Mailing
52 DELARD STREET, LOWELL, MA 01850
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2838 · Current $2000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  Site- The employer did not develop a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this jobsite where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2838

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Site- The employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to ensure that it was free from recognizable hazards where employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:  Site- Employees exposed to fall and ladder collapse hazards while ascending and descending aluminum extension ladders were not provided with ladder training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2838 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure employees used eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   Site-  Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not required to be worn by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2838

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3972 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 18 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3972

1926.502 D15 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(15)(ii): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest systems were not designed, installed and used under the supervision of a qualified person:   Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where personal fall arrest systems in use had vertical life lines connected to anchor points with knots and not by the provided snap hook, metal roof anchors were not attached to the roof surface utilizing all the required nail holes, and a qualified person did not supervise the installation and use of the personal fall arrest equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body belt was not located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body narness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.   Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from fall related injuries where the lifelines in their personal fall arrest systems were connected to the employee's full body harness at their waists.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:   Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2838 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Site- Employees using aluminum extension ladders to access the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladders extended less than three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2838

1926.1053 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(3): Ladders were loaded beyond the maximum intended load for which they are built:  Site- Employees using aluminum extension ladders to access the roof were not protected from a ladder failure hazard where three employees descended a single aluminum extension ladder at the same time, exceeding the maximum intended load for the ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348822057.