1,224,460Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-16
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: LUIS MADRID

Discrimination inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a discrimination safety inspection of LUIS MADRID in LOT 324 SUMMER RIDGE SUBDIVISION, N. BUTTERFLY DRIVE, DUNLAP, IL 61525 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 348890336.

Establishment
LUIS MADRID
Site address
LOT 324 SUMMER RIDGE SUBDIVISION, N. BUTTERFLY DRIVE
City
DUNLAP
State
IL
ZIP
61525
Mailing
2206 TODD DRIVE, APT. E, BLOOMINGTON, IL 61704
Inspection type
Discrimination (N)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4256 · Current $4256
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  On or about April 21, 2026, employees were exposed to eye injuries and overhead and fall hazards, on a residential construction site in Dunlap, Illinois.  The employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees' activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4256

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  On or about April 21, 2026, employees were exposed to eye injuries and overhead and fall hazards, on a residential construction site in Dunlap, Illinois.  The employer did not have a competent person at the construction site conducting frequent and periodic safety inspections.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3405 · Current $3405
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  On or about April 21, 2026, employees were exposed to overhead hazards without head protection, on a residential construction site in Dunlap, Illinois.  The employer did not provide the employees with safety training, in order to provide the employees with the knowledge to recognize construction safety hazards, as well as the procedures to follow in order to minimize or eliminate these safety hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3405

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects:  On or about April 21, 2026, employees were exposed to overhead hazards without head protection, while working under employees and overhead loads, on a residential construction site in Dunlap, Illinois.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5958 · Current $5958
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about April 21, 2026, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet without fall protection, while framing on a residential construction site in Dunlap, Illinois.  The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards of falling and the safety requirements associated with fall protection, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate the fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $5958

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4256 · Current $4256
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:  On or about April 21, 2026, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet, while accessing and exiting the top plate and rafters via two stepladders more than 3 feet below the upper landing surface, while framing on a residential construction site in Dunlap, Illinois.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4256

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:  On or about April 21, 2026, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet, while accessing and exiting the top plate and rafters via two stepladders more than 3 feet below the upper landing surface, while framing on a residential construction site in Dunlap, Illinois.   The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards related to ladders, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate these hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8513 · Current $8513
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  On or about April 21, 2026, an employee was exposed to eye injuries without eye protection, while using a pneumatic gun on a residential construction site in Dunlap, Illinois.  LUIS MADRID WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD OR ITS EQUIVALENT STANDARD 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 1717576, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 1 AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON JUNE 3, 2024, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 1111 22 COMMUNITY ROAD, ROCHESTER, ILLINOIS 62563.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $8513

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11916 · Current $11916
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   On or about April 21, 2026, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet without fall protection, while framing on a residential construction site in Dunlap, Illinois.  LUIS MADRID WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD OR ITS EQUIVALENT STANDARD 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 1717576, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 2 AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON JUNE 3, 2024, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 1111 22 COMMUNITY ROAD, ROCHESTER, ILLINOIS 62563.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $11916

View LUIS MADRID's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348890336.