Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DMCM CONSTRUCTION LLC

Discrimination inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a discrimination safety inspection of DMCM CONSTRUCTION LLC in 1108 CLEVELAND AVE, HAMILTON, OH 45013 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 348953365.

Watch Dmcm Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dmcm Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1108 CLEVELAND AVE
City
HAMILTON
State
OH
ZIP
45013
Mailing
4401 TAYLORSVILLE RD, DAYTON, OH 45424
Inspection type
Discrimination (N)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4256 · Current $2979 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): Accident prevention responsibilties. Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.  a) On or about May 21, 2026, the employer did not conduct adequate inspections of the job site. Employees were exposed to fall heights greater than 7 feet in that conventional fall protection was not being worn while performing roofing work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2979.2
  • — Z (S) $4256

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4256 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a) On or before May 21, 2026, the employer failed to ensure that employees performing roofing on a residential home were utilizing a personal fall arrest system. Employees were exposed to fall heights greater than 7 ft.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4256

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348953365.