EPHRATA, PA —
OSHA Inspection: EPHRATA MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EPHRATA MANUFACTURING COMPANY in 104 WEST PINE STREET, EPHRATA, PA 17522 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 102870292.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EPHRATA MANUFACTURING COMPANY
- Site address
- 104 WEST PINE STREET
- City
- EPHRATA
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 17522
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 28, EPHRATA, PA 17522
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3321
- Employees
- 62
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $560.00 · Current $400.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to increase risk of cumulative trauma disorder(s) from the tasks that they were performing and administrative or engineering controls were not provided: a) Molding Area - Molders carrying sand molds from molding machine to pouring area, molds weighed 85 and 65 pounds, and the evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employeesare exposed to an increased risk of musculoskeletal injuries based upon studies of populations exposed to similar lifting conditions, on or about May 17, 1989. b) Molding Area - Molders shoveling sand into flask to make a mold on machine and the evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to an increased risk of musculoskeletal injuries based upon studies of populations exposed to similar lifting conditions. The injury and illness records for 1988 and 1987 documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries, on or about May 17, 1989. c) Molding Area - Employees shifting molds out of the way after the molds were poured with iron and the evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to an increased risk of musculoskeletal injuries based upon studies of populations exposed to similar lifting conditions. The injury and illness records for 1988 and 1987 documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries, on or about May 17, 1989. d) Molding Area - Employees shifting the weights from poured molds to molds to be poured conditions occurs on both one man job(s) and the two man job(s) and the evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to an increased risk of musculoskeletal injuries based upon studies ofpopulations exposed to similar lifting conditions. The injury and illness records for 1988 and 1987 documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries, on or about May 17, 1989. e) Molding Area - The employees who dump the molds on the pouring floor and the evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are exposed to an increased risk of musculoskeletal injuries based upon studies of populations exposed to similar lifting conditions. The injury and illness records for 1988 and 1987 documented a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries. f) Wheelabrator Area - Employee lifting castings out of the wheelabrator and into cart/barrels, weighing from 35 to 55 pounds, and the evaluation of this manual lifting task indicates that employees are are exposed to an increased risk of musculoskeletal injuries based upon studies of populations exposed to similar lifting conditions. The injury and illness records for 1988 and 1987 documents a pattern of musculoskeletal injuries, on or about May 17, 1989. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is: Instance A - The installation of a conveyor system to eliminate the manual handling of sand molds. Instance B - The installation of a sand handling system. Instance C - Improved layout of the mold pouring area to eliminate or significantly reduce the need for shifting or by the installation of a conveyor system. Instance D - Any combination of the four suggestions listed below: 1) By increasing the heights at which the weights must be shifted. 2) By the installation of a monorail system. 3) By placing handles on the weights. 4) By the installation of a mold conveyor system. Instance E - The use of a mechanized shake-out system. Instance F - The installation of a hoist STEP #1 Effective administrative protection, such as employee training, physical assessment, job rotation, etc. shall be provided as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering or permanent administrative measures to control employee injury due to manual lifting tasks. Engineering controls to reduce musculoskeletal stresses include, but are not limited to, job redesign, reduction of the horizontal and vertical load distance from the body, reduction of the lifting frequency or weight, and use of mechanical lifting aids. This plan shall include at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the dates required by this citation. 1) Evaluation of the conditions, locations and manual lifting activities that the employees are performing at the onset of musculoskeletal injuries; 2) Evaluation of applicable control measures(s). 3) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures(s). ALL PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE APPROVED FOR EACH PARTICULAR USE BY A PERSON TRAINED IN THE EVALUATION OF WORKPLACE CONDITIONS CAUSE MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS. NINETY (90) DAY PROGRESS REPORTS ARE REQUIRED DURING THE ABATEMENT PERIOD. STEP #3 Develop a rehabilitation program for injured workers. The program is expected to include exercise, building stamina, training in safe lifting techniques, work conditioning and demonstration that the worker is able to resume work. STEP #4 Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls. Where the lifting task analysis in NIOSH's Work Practices Guide for Manual Lifting has been utilized, compliance will be achieved when the calculated action level is met.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $400.00
- — Z (S) $560.00
More inspections at EPHRATA MANUFACTURING COMPANY
EPHRATA, PA—2006-01-31 00:00:00
EPHRATA MANUFACTURING COMPANY
EPHRATA, PA—2003-10-24 00:00:00
EPHRATA MANUFACTURING COMPANY
EPHRATA, PA—2000-06-20 00:00:00
EPHRATA MANUFACTURING COMPANY
EPHRATA, PA—1999-04-23 00:00:00
EPHRATA MANUFACTURING COMPANY
EPHRATA, PA—1997-07-15 00:00:00
EPHRATA MANUFACTURING COMPANY
View EPHRATA MANUFACTURING COMPANY's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
SCHENECTADY, NY—2012-01-05 00:00:00
BRUCE D. BOWMAN
BILLINGS, MT—2005-01-25 00:00:00
KGC, INC.
ROCKAWAY, NJ—2002-12-31 00:00:00
ROCKAWAY BOROUGH DPW
FOREST CITY, NC—2002-12-31 00:00:00
HARRY BRICKEY DBA A. BRICKEY CEILING COMPANY
EDGERTON, KS—2002-12-31 00:00:00
SUDDEN BOND INDUSTRIES
More inspections in PA
COLUMBIA, PA—2026-07-17 00:00:00
FOX TAPPING INC.
COLUMBIA, PA—2026-07-17 00:00:00
COLUMBIA WATER CO
WILKES BARRE, PA—2026-07-17 00:00:00
NEW ENTERPRISE STONE & LIME CO., INC.
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16 00:00:00
MUKHLEEN GERNAROS PIZZA LLC DBA GENARO'S PIZZERIA AND STEAKS
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16 00:00:00
CENTER CITY CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 102870292.