MUSKOGEE, OK —
OSHA Inspection: AMERICAN FOUNDRY GROUP
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of AMERICAN FOUNDRY GROUP in 612 S. 45TH STREET, MUSKOGEE, OK 74401 (NAICS 000000). OSHA activity number 304961527.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMERICAN FOUNDRY GROUP
- Site address
- 612 S. 45TH STREET
- City
- MUSKOGEE
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 74401
- Mailing
- 412 S. 45TH ST. E., MUSKOGEE, OK 74401
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 000000
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3325
- Employees
- 135
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that employees were exposed to water/metal explosions resulting from inadequate charge drying procedures. On or about 2/1/02, a melter was fatally burned during a furnace explosion that was apparently caused by introduction of wet charge material into the melt. Among other means, acceptable and feasible means of abatement include: 1.Develop and implement a written work procedure for drying wet charge materials using natural gas torches. This procedure should at a minimum include the following: a)A specific assignment of responsibility to those employees who will be responsible for drying the charge materials. Ensure that drying of the metal is performed only by employees who are specifically assigned that responsibility. b)A specific assignment of responsibility to those employees who will be responsible for inspecting the charge materials after drying to ensure all moisture has been removed from the metal. Ensure that inspection of the metal is performed only by employees who are specifically assigned that responsibility. c)Specific criteria for determining which scrap material requires drying and which does not. d)Detailed work procedures to be followed when drying the charge materials using natural gas torches which will ensure uniform and complete drying of the metal. e)A detailed description of the charge inspection procedures that will be followed to ensure that no residual moisture remains in the charge material when the drying has been completed. These procedures should be sufficient to ensure that wet metal is never placed into the furnace. f)A means of enforcing the charge drying procedures and the charge inspection procedures. 2.Store all charge materials in a covered area to prevent collection of moisture in the charge materials. 3.Install a pre-heater or scrap dryer designed to maximize the removal of water or moisture before the charge enters the metal bath.4.Protect employees from metal splash through the use of a remote charging system to feed all charge materials, including remelt, into the furnace. Remote charging systems permit the furnace operator to be safely back from the furnace or behind protective screens during charging. Use American Foundry's vibratory conveyor to feed all charge materials, including remelt risers, into the furnace. If remelt risers are too long to be fed in this matter, cut the remelt into shorter pieces or design the gates and risers in the castings so they are the right size. 5.Use a combination of the options listed above, such as a preheater/dryers and remote charging system, undercover storage of charge materials and detailed work procedures for drying charge material/inspection of charge material, etc. The employer is not limited to any of the recommended abatement methods.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $10000.00
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that employees such as but not limited to melters were exposed to being splashed with molten metal or struck by sparks while wearing synthetic clothing that would readily ignite, melt and stick to the skin. On or about 2/1/02, Steven Meredith, a melter, was exposed to a water/metal explosion. He was wearing clothing made from 65polyester, which ignited and burned. Among others methods, acceptable and feasible means of abatement to correct his hazard are as follows: 1.Provide and enforce the use of secondary protective clothing, such as but not limited to flame resistant overalls. Secondary protective clothing should be worn under primary protective clothing. 2.Implement and enforce American Foundry Group's written work rule that no synthetic clothing should be worn in the foundry. Train employees on this work rule and the reasons that synthetic materials are hazardous in foundry settings. 3.Develop and implement a system for ensuring that no synthetic materials are worn in the foundry. The employer is not limited to any of the recommended abatement methods.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $10000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5000.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that the employer had not implemented measures to prevent employees from entering the hazardous zones around the furnaces. Among other methods, acceptable and feasible means of abatement follow: 1.As recommended by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in ANSI Z241.2, paragraph E.5.2.4.1, designate the area extending from the edge of each furnace to a distance of approximately 20 feet or 5 times the inside diameter of the crucible (whichever is greater) radially from the center of the furnace as a hazardous zone. Outline the border of the hazardous zone with a physical barrier. 2.Designate the same safety area as described above with entrance limited to authorized employees performing authorized tasks. Outline the border of this area with yellow lines on the floor and signs posted to indicate that it is a hazardous area. 3.As outlined by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in ANSI Z241.2, designate which employees will be authorized to enter the hazardous zones around the furnaces. Specify the tasks for which each of those employees will be responsible. Restrict access to the hazardous zones to the authorized entrants and allow them to enter only to perform authorized tasks. 4.Ensure that all authorized personnel, including furnace operators, stay out of the hazardous zones around the furnace as much as possible. Use remotely controlled charging, slagging, pouring, sampling and temperature measuring devices whenever practical. Remote charging systems permit the furnace operator to be safely back from the furnace or behind protective screens during charging. Use American Foundry's vibratory conveyor to feed all charge materials, including remelt risers, into the furnace. If remelt risers are too long to be fed in this manner, cut the remelt into shorter pieces or design the gates and risers in the castings so that they are the right size. 5.Implement and enforce written procedures that include which employees are authorized to enter the zone and specify what personal protective equipment is to be worn in the hazardous zone. The employer is not limited to the recommended abatement methods.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.132 D01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $7000.00
More inspections at AMERICAN FOUNDRY GROUP
MUSKOGEE, OK—2011-10-21 00:00:00
AMERICAN FOUNDRY GROUP
MUSKOGEE, OK—2003-04-08 00:00:00
AMERICAN FOUNDRY GROUP
MUSKOGEE, OK—2003-04-08 00:00:00
AMERICAN FOUNDRY GROUP
MUSKOGEE, OK—2003-04-08 00:00:00
AMERICAN FOUNDRY GROUP
MUSKOGEE, OK—2002-03-13 00:00:00
AMERICAN FOUNDRY GROUP
View AMERICAN FOUNDRY GROUP's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 000000)
SCHENECTADY, NY—2012-01-05 00:00:00
BRUCE D. BOWMAN
BILLINGS, MT—2005-01-25 00:00:00
KGC, INC.
ROCKAWAY, NJ—2002-12-31 00:00:00
ROCKAWAY BOROUGH DPW
FOREST CITY, NC—2002-12-31 00:00:00
HARRY BRICKEY DBA A. BRICKEY CEILING COMPANY
EDGERTON, KS—2002-12-31 00:00:00
SUDDEN BOND INDUSTRIES
More inspections in OK
TULSA, OK—2026-07-15
LA UNION 7 LLC
MADILL, OK—2026-07-08
MID AMERICAN STEEL & WIRE CO., LLC
SEILING, OK—2026-06-26
GORE ENERGY
ADA, OK—2026-06-25
PAN AMERICA ELECTRIC , INC.
ADA, OK—2026-06-25
CITATION OIL & GAS CORPORATION
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 304961527.