AUGUSTA, GA —
OSHA Inspection: DSM CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DSM CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC. in 1736 LOVERS LANE, AUGUSTA, GA 30901 (NAICS 325199). OSHA activity number 306212887.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DSM CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
- Site address
- 1736 LOVERS LANE
- City
- AUGUSTA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30901
- Mailing
- 1 COLUMBIA NITROGEN, AUGUSTA, GA 30901
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325199
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2869
- Employees
- 352
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2625.00 · Current $2625.00
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that engineering and work practice controls were not implemented to reduce and maintain employees exposure to airborne caprolactam vapor according to the ACGIH's Threshold Limit Value of 5 mg/M: a) A bagger in the flake room was exposed to caprolactam at a TWA of 24.4 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/M), approximately 4.87 times the limit of 5 mg/M. The employee's duties included bagging for two times during the sampling period, as well as stacking bags outside of the flake room. The exposure was derived from one sample collected over a 390 minute period. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of 90 minutes. b) A bagger in the flake room was exposed to caprolactam at a TWA of 10.6 mg/M, approximately 2.1 times the limit of 5 mg/M. The employee's duties included bagging one time during the sampling period, as well as stacking bags outside the flaking room. The exposure was derived from one sample collected over a 360 minute period. Zero was assumed for the unsampled period of 120 minutes. NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to: 1) increase the local source capture at the bagging site 2) develop a supplied air island. However, other methods of abatement may be equally, or more appropriate. Ultimate responsibility for determining the most appropriate abatement method rests with the employer, given its superior knowledge of the specific conditions at its worksite. ABATEMENT STEPS: STEP 1:Effective respiratory protection shall be provided and used by exposed employees as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering and/or administrative controls can be implemented, or whenever such controls fail to reduce employee exposure to within permissible exposure limits. STEP 2:Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposure to hazardous substances as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation: (1)Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options; (2)Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design; (3)Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; and (4)Testing and acceptable or modification/redesign of controls.All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person. Ninety -(90) day progress reports are required during the abatement period. STEP 3:Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2625.00
- — Z (S) $2625.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1125.00 · Current $562.00 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $562.00
- — Z (S) $1125.00
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1125.00 · Current $1125.00
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1125.00
- — Z (S) $1125.00
More inspections at DSM CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
AUGUSTA, GA—2011-09-13 00:00:00
DSM CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
AUGUSTA, GA—2011-01-21 00:00:00
DSM CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
AUGUSTA, GA—2009-10-01 00:00:00
DSM CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
AUGUSTA, GA—1997-07-10 00:00:00
DSM CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
AUGUSTA, GA—1991-01-30 00:00:00
DSM CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
View DSM CHEMICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325199)
HOPEWELL, VA—2026-06-17 00:00:00
ADVANSIX RESINS AND CHEMICALS LLC
GEORGETOWN, SC—2026-06-04 00:00:00
77516 - 3V SIGMA USA INC
GEISMAR, LA—2026-05-28 00:00:00
RUBICON LLC
CICERO, IL—2026-05-28 00:00:00
KOPPERS CARBON MATERIALS LLC
NARROWS, VA—2026-05-19 00:00:00
CELANESE ACETATE LLC
More inspections in GA
CHAMBLEE, GA—2026-07-16 00:00:00
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
LAWRENCEVILLE, GA—2026-07-16 00:00:00
REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY
GREENSBORO, GA—2026-07-16 00:00:00
PURE BEAUTY FARMS, INC.
FOREST PARK, GA—2026-07-16 00:00:00
POLYNT COMPOSITES USA INC.
AUGUSTA, GA—2026-07-16 00:00:00
GF CASTING SOLUTIONS AUGUSTA, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 306212887.