Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NEW JERSEY AMERICAN WATER COMPANY

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of NEW JERSEY AMERICAN WATER COMPANY in 167 J. F. KENNEDY PARKWAY, SHORT HILLS, NJ 07078 (NAICS 221310). OSHA activity number 316180900.

Watch NEW Jersey American Water Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for NEW Jersey American Water Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
167 J. F. KENNEDY PARKWAY
City
SHORT HILLS
State
NJ
ZIP
07078
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
221310
SIC code (legacy)
4941
Employees
110
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D01 VI

Other-than-serious Gravity 05 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5000.00 · Current $5000.00
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(1)(vi):   Process safety information pertaining to the
hazards of the highly
hazardous chemicals in the process did not contain the thermal and
chemical stability data:
a) Ton container room
Process safety documentation did not include the hazard of nitrogen
trichloride accumulating in
ton containers of chlorine
Violation observed on or about 1/20/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (O) $5000.00
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

1910.119 D03 IB

Other-than-serious Gravity 05 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4000.00 · Current $5000.00
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B):  Process safety information pertaining to the
equipment in the
process did not include the piping and instrument diagrams (P&ID'S):
Ton container room
a)  TCPA-4 Detail "A" did not indicate that the vacuum regulator check
unit relief was plugged
on each container and separate pressure relief valves were installed
downstream before the
rotometers.
b)  TCPA-4 Detail "A", which was for the Vacuum Regulator Assembly,
erroneously included
a rotometer located downstream from the regulator.
c)  TCPA-3, pressure control valves PCV 112A-112D were indicated
downstream of pressure
relief valves, rather than upstream.
d)  TCPA-3 did not include set pressure of pressure relief valves V-PO5
through V-PO 8.
Violation disclosed on or about 1/20/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (O) $5000.00
  • — Z (S) $4000.00

1910.119 D03 ID

Other-than-serious Gravity 05 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5000.00 · Current $5000.00
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(D):  Process safety information pertaining to the
equipment in the
process did not include the relief system design and design basis:
a) Ton container room
Process safety information did not include the design basis for the remote
mounted pressure
relief valves.
Violation disclosed on or about 3/7/12.ed
Recent events (2)
  • — F (O) $5000.00
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

1910.119 D03 IF

Deleted Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5000.00 · Current $5000.00
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(F):  Process safety information pertaining to the
equipment did not
include the design codes and standards employed:
a) Establishment
Design codes and/or standards specific to equipment in the chlorination
process including, but
not limited to, chlorinators, piping, injectors and vacuum regulators were
not made available.
Violation observed on or about 1/20/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $5000.00
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

1910.119 E03 IV

Other-than-serious Gravity 05 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4000.00 · Current $5000.00
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iv): The process hazard analysis did not address
consequences of failure
of engineering and administrative controls.
a) Ton container room
The 2008 Process Hazard Analysis incorrectly listed pressure reliefs on
the vacuum regulator
check units as a safeguard if the vacuum regulator check units failed
open; the relief vents on
the vacuum regulator check units were plugged.
Violation observed on or about 1/20/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (O) $5000.00
  • — Z (S) $4000.00

1910.119 F01 IIIB

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4000.00 · Current $5000.00
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(B):  The employer's written operating
procedures covering safety and
health considerations did not address the precautions necessary to prevent
exposure, including
engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective
equipment:
a) Ton container room
The employer's written operating procedures for connecting and
disconnecting chlorine
containers in TCPA RMP binder Appendix B did not specify the use of face
or respiratory
protection.
Violation disclosed on or about 1/24/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $5000.00
  • — Z (S) $4000.00

1910.119 J02

Deleted Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4000.00 · Current $4000.00
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2):  The employer did not establish and implement
written procedures to
maintain the on-going mechanical integrity of process equipment:
a) Establishment
There were no written procedures for inspection of polyvinyl chloride
(PVC) or polyethylene
piping used to convey chlorine gas.
Violation disclosed on or about 1/20/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $4000.00
  • — Z (S) $4000.00

1910.119 J04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Abate by
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i):  Inspections and tests were not performed on
process equipment to
maintain its mechanical integrity:
a) Establishment
There was no formal inspection for polyvinyl chloride (PVC) piping used to
convey chlorine
gas.
Violation disclosed on or about 2/28/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.119 O01

Deleted Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5000.00 · Current $5000.00
29 CFR 1910.119(o)(1):  The employer did not certify that they had
evaluated compliance with
the provisions of 29 CFR 1910.119 at least every three years to verify
that the procedures and
practices developed under this standard were adequate and are being
followed:
a) Establishment
The New Jersey American Water 2011 TCPA Compliance Audit Report did not
identify
deficiencies in process safety management of the chlorination process
including, but not limited
to,
1.Deficiencies in TCPA-4, Detail "A" and TCPA-3.
2.Absence of design codes and standards specific to equipment in the
chlorination
3.Lack of formal inspections for polyvinyl chloride piping used to convey
chlorine gas.
4.Absence of the design basis for the remote mounted pressure relief
valves.
Violation disclosed on or about 1/20/12
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $5000.00
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

View NEW JERSEY AMERICAN WATER COMPANY's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 316180900.