Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: AMANTEA NONWOVENS, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of AMANTEA NONWOVENS, LLC in 6715 STEGER DR., CINCINNATI, OH 45237 (NAICS 313230). OSHA activity number 330924861.

Watch Amantea Nonwovens, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Amantea Nonwovens, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6715 STEGER DR.
City
CINCINNATI
State
OH
ZIP
45237
Mailing
6715 STEGER DR., CINCINNATI, OH 45237
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
313230
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.146 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2618.00 · Current $2618.00
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(1): \\r\\n\\r\\nBefore entry is authorized, the employer shall document the completion of measures required by paragraph (d)(3) of this section by preparing an entry permit.\\r\\n\\r\\na) The employer did not fill out entry permits entirely and verify that the requirements in paragraph (d)(3) had been completed prior to entry into the Fleissner oven.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2618
  • — Z (S) $2618

1910.146 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.146(j)(2): \r\n\r\nThe employer did not ensure that the entry supervisors verified, by checking that the appropriate entries have been made on the permit, that all tests specified by the permit have been conducted and that all procedures and equipment specified by the permit are in place before endorsing the permit and allowing entry to begin;\r\n\r\na)  On the permits dated 5/11/2011 and 5/26/2011 the entry checklist section of the permit had not been filled out by the supervisor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 J03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2618.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(j)(3): The employer did not ensure that each entry supervisor terminated the entry and canceled the permit as required by 29 CFR 1010.146(e)5):\r\n\r\na) The entry supervisor had not made sure that every entry into the Fleissner dryer was made that the permit had been canceled after entry was complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2618

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): \r\n\r\nThe employer did not provide the required injury or illness descriptions on the Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, OSHA Form 300:\r\n\r\na) The employer did not describe in detail the injury or illness in Column F on the OSHA log for calendar years 2008-2011.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1904.10 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1904.10(a): \r\n\r\nWhere an employee\'s hearing test (audiogram) revealed that the employee had experienced a work-related Standard Threshold Shift (STS) in hearing in one or both ears, and the employee\'s total hearing level was 25 decibels (dB) or more above audiometric zero (Averaged at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz) in the same ear(s) as the STS, the employer did not record the case on the OSHA 300 Log: \r\n\r\na) On February 22, 2011 the hearing tests revealed two OSHA recordable standard threshold shifts and they were not recorded on the OSHA 300 Log for 2011.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): \r\n\r\nThe employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, identified the document as a certification of the hazard assessment:\r\n\r\na)  A written certification of the hazard assessment had not been completed by the employer for employees working in areas such as but not limited to the ovens and dryers
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

KENWORTH

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330924861.