Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: PREMIER ROOFING COMPANY LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PREMIER ROOFING COMPANY LLC in 11365 CRANSTON AVE, PEYTON, CO 80831 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 331064931.

Watch Premier Roofing Company LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Premier Roofing Company LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11365 CRANSTON AVE
City
PEYTON
State
CO
ZIP
80831
Mailing
2570 W. 8TH AVE., DENVER, CO 80204
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):  Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    a)  On or about September 17, 2011 and at times prior, Premier Roofing Co., LLC as controlling contractor, did not ensure that Pacheco Roofing (subcontractor) protected their employees from eye hazards.  Employees were using pneumatic nailers to install shingles without wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.307 D01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2400.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.307(d)(1):  Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet (2.128 m) or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in paragraphs  (m) and  (o) of this section:    a)  On or about September 17, 2011 and at times prior, Premier Roofing Co., LLC as controlling contractor, did not ensure that Pacheco Roofing (subcontractor) protected their employees from mechanical power hazards.  A portable compressor, used to power pneumatic nailers for shingle installation, had no guarding for the belt and pulley.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.307 E01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.307(e)(1)(i):  Where both runs of a horizontal belt were 42 inches (106.68 cm) or less from the floor, the belt was not fully enclosed:    a)  On or about September 17, 2011 and at times prior, Premier Roofing Co., LLC as controlling contractor, did not ensure that Pacheco Roofing (subcontractor) protected their employees from mechanical power-transmission hazards.  The portable compressor, used to produce air for pneumatic nailers, did not have guards installed over the belt and pulleys.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4200.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor  did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502.    a)  On or about September 17, 2011 and at times prior, Premier Roofing Co, LLC as controlling/exposing contractor, did not ensure that its employees and employees of Pacheco Roofing (subcontractor) were protected from fall hazards from a roof.  The crew installing the shingles was using no type of fall protection system, neither did they have a plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3000.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):  Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    a)  On or about September 17, 2011 and at times prior, Premier Roofing Co., LLC as controlling/exposing contractor, did not ensure that its employees and employees of Pacheco Roofing (subcontractor) did not ensure that employees were protected from ladder hazards.  The roofing crew did not properly set  up the ladder used to access the roof.  The side rails were not extended at least 3 feet above the landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were used on surfaces which were not stable and level:    a)  On or about September 17, 2011 and at times prior, Premier Roofing Co., LLC as controlling/exposing contractor, did not ensure that its employees and employees of Pacheco Roofing were protected from ladder use hazards.  The ladder, used to access the roofing level, was set up on hard packed ground without being secured at top or bottom.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(10):  The tops of a non-self-supporting ladder were not placed with the two rails supported equally:    a)  On or about September 17, 2011 and at times prior, Premier Roofing Co., LLC as controlling/exposing contractor, did not ensure that its employees and employees of Pacheco Roofing (subcontractor) were protected from ladder use hazards.  The ladder, used to access the roof area, was not set with equal support from both rails due to gable end slope.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View PREMIER ROOFING COMPANY LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331064931.