Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: JUAN PEREZ DBA RITE RUG

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUAN PEREZ DBA RITE RUG in 5326 PADDOCK FALLS DRIVE, HILLIARD, OH 43026 (NAICS 238350). OSHA activity number 331916528.

Watch Juan Perez DBA Rite RUG — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Juan Perez DBA Rite RUG is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5326 PADDOCK FALLS DRIVE
City
HILLIARD
State
OH
ZIP
43026
Mailing
3949 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43204
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238350
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2040.00 · Current $1428.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.          At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided with and utilized eye protection while using power saws to cut materials, thereby exposing employees to a potential struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1428
  • — Z (S) $2040

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2040.00 · Current $1428.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.          At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from fall hazards while cutting materials from the unguarded terrace area of the townhouse, thereby exposing employees to an approximate 12 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1428
  • — Z (S) $2040

LIPPERT

PROVIA

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 331916528.