OSHA Inspection: PET WORLD, INC.

Issued

2012-07-13 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-08-03 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1530.00 · Current $1071.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6):     The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were not maintained in a legible condition:    (a) A Toyota forklift did not have legible nameplates in place on the forklift. Employees have no way of knowing the lifting capacity of the forklift putting the driver and employees working in the vicinity of the forklift at danger.

Issued

2012-07-13 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-08-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1530.00 · Current $1071.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii):     An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    (a) The employer is not conducting an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operators performance every three years.

Issued

2012-07-13 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-08-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7):     Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:    (a) The employer did not ensure that a daily examination of the forklift was conducted before each shift.

Issued

2012-07-13 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-08-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):     The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a) The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program where employees work with Jungle Start Right, Kordon Methylene Blue, bleach, and other cleaning solutions.

Issued

2012-07-13 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-08-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):     The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area.    (a) The employer did not ensure that employees have been properly trained on Hazard Communication in that employees had little to no knowledge of what Hazard Communication was, what MSDS were, or on any hazards associated with chemicals that they use on site.