OSHA Inspection: DIMENSIONAL CONTRACTORS, LLC

Issued

2012-08-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-08-13 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $600.00 · Current $600.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):  The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.    The employer did not submit documentation regarding teh abatement of teh following cited hazards:    a.  Eye protection not worn while using a pneumatice nail gun to install roofing shingles.    b.  Employees installing roofing shingles were not protected from falls.

Issued

2012-05-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-05-11 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3600.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.                              Employees were not provided with safety glasses while using a pnuematic nail gun to install shingles on a roof.

Issued

2012-05-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-05-11 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4200.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.                Employees installing shingles on a residential roof were not protected from falling to lower levels.