BRIDGEPORT, CT —
OSHA Inspection: BLACK HORSE AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BLACK HORSE AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, INC in 726 UNION AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 332837582.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BLACK HORSE AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, INC
- Site address
- 726 UNION AVENUE
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06607
- Mailing
- 726 UNION AVE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
18 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.38 B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review: WORKSHOP: The employer had not established a written emergency evacuation plan for the employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.38 E
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(e): An employer did not designate and train employees to assist in a safe and orderly evacuation of other employees. WORKSHOP: The employer had not designated and trained employees to assist other employees during an emergency evacuation process.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: WORKSHOP: The employer had not assessed the workplace to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: WORKSHOP: The employer had not trained all the employees on the Workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 E
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1800.00 · Current $900.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(e): Defective and damaged equipment. Defective or damaged personal protective equipment shall not be used. WORKSHOP: The left glove of the Skat Blast Dry blast system was defective and ripped.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900
- — Z (S) $1800
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures was established and implemented to include the provisions of (i)-(ix), as applicable. WORKSHOP: The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard worksite-specific respiratory protection program and procedures consisting of employee training, proper selection, fit testing, and medical evaluations where employees were required to wear half face piece cartridge respirators and dust/filtering face piece during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting and priming.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee can demonstrate knowledge of items in (i)-(vii) of the respiratory protection standard. WORKSHOP: The employer had not trained and evaluated the employees who were required to wear half face piece cartridge respirators and dust/filtering face piece during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting and priming operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee���s ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: WORKSHOP: The employees, required to wear the half face piece cartridge respirators and filtering facepieces during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting, priming, and body work had not been medically evaluated for their ability prior to the employees wearing the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter. WORKSHOP: The employees, required to wear the half face piece cartridge respirators during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray painting had not been fit tested prior to initial wear.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: WORKSHOP: The employer had not established and implemented a site specific hazardous energy control lockout/tagout program consisting of machine specific step-by-step written energy control procedures and employee training for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the lifts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: WORKSHOP: The employe had not established and implemented site specific step-by-step written energy control procedures in the machine specific for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to the lifts).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees: WORKSHOP: The employees, as affected and other types were not provided with training and information in the controlling of potentially hazardous and unexpected releases of energy sources (lockout/tagout) during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited) to the lifts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts: WORKSHOP: 1. The rotating chuck of the SouthBend lathe was unguarded. 2. The end nut on the left buffer wheel of the DeWalt DW758 bench grinder was unguarded. 3. The end nut on the right wire brush wheel of the SouthBend Lathe pedestal grinder was unguarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: WORKSHOP: The right work rest of the DeWalt DW758 bench grinder was not adjusted to within one eighth of an inch (1/8). ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch. WOKRHSOP: The tongue guard of the SouthBend Lathe pedestal grinder was not adjusted to one quarter of an inch (1/4). ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: WORKSHOP: The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program where employees were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) the chemicals consisted of paints, welding gases, oils, greases, and coolant.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: WORKSHOP: The employees, required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) paints, welding gases, oils, greases and coolant were not provided with training and information in the chemical hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguisher(s) or hose(s) used in lieu thereof under paragraph (d)(3) of this section were not visually inspected monthly: WORKSHOP: The portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected on a monthly basis.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at BLACK HORSE AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, INC
BRIDGEPORT, CT—2017-06-06 00:00:00
BLACK HORSE AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, INC
View BLACK HORSE AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
SUMMIT, IL—2026-07-08
BUDS BODY SHOP SUPPLY & PAINT
PUYALLUP, WA—2026-07-08
WA317991990 - GLASS WORKS PRO INC
SALEM, VA—2026-07-08
CERTIFIED COLLISION REPAIR
TUMWATER, WA—2026-07-07
WA317991940 - EMERGENCY VEHICLE SOLUTIONS LLC
ASHLAND, OR—2026-06-26
317744632 - HINKS ENTERPRISES INC
More inspections in CT
BRIDGEPORT, CT—2026-07-10
WRR, INC.
BERLIN, CT—2026-07-10
MMF CONSTRUCTION LLC
NAUGATUCK, CT—2026-07-08
WHITING-TURNER LCT2 JOINT VENTURE
SOMERS, CT—2026-07-08
F&G RECYCLING LLC
STAMFORD, CT—2026-07-07
FAIRFIELD AVENUE MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 332837582.