Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: PEDRO HERNANDEZ ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PEDRO HERNANDEZ ROOFING in 831 NEEB RD, CINCINNATI, OH 45233 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 333961043.

Watch Pedro Hernandez Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pedro Hernandez Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
831 NEEB RD
City
CINCINNATI
State
OH
ZIP
45233
Mailing
8833 S. KEYSTONE AVE APT 8, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46227
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2):     The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions andthe regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury.    The employer did not ensure that frequent and regular inspections were conducted in that employees were exposed to fall hazards while engaged in a roofing operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    Employees were engaged in a residential roofing operation on a condominium complex in Cincinnati, Ohio and exposed to a fall hazard in excess of 18 feet while not attaching their conventional fall protection system to a anchor system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

KENWORTH

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 333961043.