Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: L & M INC.

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of L & M INC. in 8500 YANKEETOWN-CHENOWETH ROAD, LONDON, OH 43140 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 334683414.

Watch L & M INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for L & M INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
L & M INC.
Site address
8500 YANKEETOWN-CHENOWETH ROAD
City
LONDON
State
OH
ZIP
43140
Mailing
10520 S. 400 W., MONTPELIER, IN 47359
Inspection type
Programmed Related (J)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):     It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.    a.     On the site where a dairy barn was being consructed, the employer did not develop and maintain a Site Specific Acident Prevention Pogram for employees on the site thereby exposin them to fall and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):     Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.    a.     On the site where employees were building a new daiy barn, regular an frequent inspections were not performed to identify hazards relating to falls, impalement hazards, electrica hazards and lack of personnel protection equipment thereby exposing employees to a fall/contact hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    a.     On the site where employees were using a chain saw to cut sections of bracing for the roof trusses, the employees were not provided or enforced to wear eye protection thereby exposing employees to a contact hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v):     A body belt shall be worn and a lanyard attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift.  Note to paragraph (b)(2)(v): As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e).    a.     On the site where a dairy barn was being built and braces were installed from the bucket of a JLG aerial lift, the employer did not ensure a fall restaint device was provided and enforced to be used thereby exposing the employees to a 30 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):     "Unprotected sides and edges." Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    a.     On th roof of the dairy barn being built,the general contractor did not ensure the employees of Martin Wickey were provided and enforced to wear fall protection thereby exposing employees to a 35 foot fall hazard. One employee working on the roof installing weather straps lost his balence and fell to the concrete floor below. The employee was not wearing fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.    a.     On the site where employees worked at heights which exceeded six  feet, the employer did not provide fll protection training for employees who were required to ensure fall protection was used properly and the policy enforced.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.701(b):     Reinforcing steel. All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and into which employees could fall, shall be guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement.    a.     On the floor below the area where employees were installing roof strapping, the employer did not provide protection over the reinforced steel sticking up from the concrete thereby exposing employees to a impalement hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

KENWORTH

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334683414.