Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: JC SILVA REMODELING SERVICE LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JC SILVA REMODELING SERVICE LLC in 149 WESTPORT AVE, NORWALK, CT 06851 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 334999398.

Watch JC Silva Remodeling Service LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JC Silva Remodeling Service LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
149 WESTPORT AVE
City
NORWALK
State
CT
ZIP
06851
Mailing
827 NORTH AVE SUITE 168, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.      Worksite:  Employees who were using pneumatic nail guns were not provided with and required to wear eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7):     Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration.  Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.        Worksite:  Employees were working on a ladder jack scaffold that had not been erected under the direction of, and inspected by, a competent person prior to allowing employees to begin work on the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.452 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.452(k):     Ladders that were used to support ladder jack scaffolds did not meet the requirements of subpart X of this part, Stairways and Ladders.        Worksite:  Employees were working on a ladder jack scaffold which was being supported by an aluminum extension ladder that had at least four (4) broken and/or bent rungs as well as missing feet and the ladder had not been removed from service.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Because of the portable ladder's length, the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access and the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support and as grasping device was not provided:      Worksite:  Employees were accessing the flat roof using an aluminum ladder that did not extend at least three (3) feet above the upper landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G01 I

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $28000.00 · Current $28000.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i):     Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:        Worksite:  Employees were working on a ladder jack scaffold without fall protection and were exposed to fall hazards of up to 15 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (W) $28000

1926.501 B11

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $28000.00 · Current $28000.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11):     Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:        Worksite:  Employees were performing roofing activities on a steep pitch roof without fall protection and were exposed to fall hazards to up to 18 feet 1 inch.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (W) $28000

1926.501 B10

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10):     Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and fuardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system.      Worksite:  Employees who were working on a flat roof were not provided with fall protection and were exposed to fall hazards of up to 20 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (W) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 334999398.