Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ERVIN GEE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ERVIN GEE in 24 WHITE ST, STRATFORD, CT 06615 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 335293403.

Watch Ervin GEE — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ervin GEE is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ERVIN GEE
Site address
24 WHITE ST
City
STRATFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06615
Mailing
57 BELLEVUE TER, SEYMOUR, CT 06483
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b):    Worksite: The owner and two employees were engaged in residential construction on a high slope 10 in 12 pitch roof at heights between approximately 10'4" and 21'6" without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Worksite: Employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on a high slope 10 in 12 pitch roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     Where a portable ladder was used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed:    Worksite: The employer and an employee were using a portable, extension ladder to gain access to the roof and platforms attached to the front-side of the roof. The side rails of the ladder were not extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i):     Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):    Worksite: The employer and an employee were using a portable, extension ladder to gain access to the roof and platforms attached to the front-side of a steep roof. The ladder was being used at an angle of approximately 2:1.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335293403.