Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: PREFERRED DRYWALL BY MCDOWELL & ARIAIL, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of PREFERRED DRYWALL BY MCDOWELL & ARIAIL, INC. in 4210 UNIVERSITY AVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32216 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 335589396.

Watch Preferred Drywall BY Mcdowell & Ariail, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Preferred Drywall BY Mcdowell & Ariail, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4210 UNIVERSITY AVE
City
JACKSONVILLE
State
FL
ZIP
32216
Mailing
2332 DUNN AVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32218
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):   Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):    a.   On or about August 6, 2012, on the north side of the building, the scaffold was not fully planked, exposing an employee to a 13 feet fall hazard.    b.   On or about August 6, 2012, on the south side of the building, the scaffold was not fully planked, exposing an employee to a 16 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):    Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    a.   On or about August 6, 2012, on the north side of the building, the scaffold did not have a guardrail system, exposing an employee to a 13 feet fall hazard.    b.   On or about August 6, 2012, on the south side of the building, the scaffold did not have a guardrail system, exposing an employee to a 16 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7):    Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person:    a.   On or about August 6, 2012, on the north side of the building, the scaffold was not erected under the supervision of a competent person.    b.   On or about August 6, 2012, on the north side of the building, the scaffold was not erected under the supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):    Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    a.   On or about August 6, 2012, on the south side of the building, an employee installing metal framing on the edge of the parapet wall was not protected from a 19 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2):   Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:    a.   On or about August 6, 2012, on the north side of the building, one leg of the scaffold did not have base plates or mudsills.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335589396.