Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DUC CONSTRUCTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DUC CONSTRUCTION in 24 JOHN STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10038 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 335713004.

Watch DUC Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for DUC Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DUC CONSTRUCTION
Site address
24 JOHN STREET
City
NEW YORK
State
NY
ZIP
10038
Mailing
6-53 152ND STREET, WHITESTONE, NY 11357
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 D08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(8):  Horizontal lifelines were not designed, installed, and used under the supervision of a qualified person, as part of a complete personal fall arrest system, which maintains a safety factor of at least two:    a)  A 5/16 inch thick steel cable was used for a fall protection horizontal lifeline. The employer did not determine whether the cable is strong enough use as a horizontal lifeline. Located at the upper floor, rear.      Location:  24 John Street, New York, N.Y.     On or about 4-20-2012     Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.502 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(3): Guardrail systems were not capable of withstanding, without failure, a force of at least 200 pounds applied within two inches of the top edge, in any outward or downward direction at any point along the top edge:    a)  The wood guardrail at the edge of the 6th floor was damaged (cracked) causing it to  be unstable; employees were exposed to fall hazard.      Location:  24 John Street, New York, N.Y.     On or about 4-20-2012     Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.854 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.854(b) During demolition operations; All walls were not left in a stable condition at the end of each shift:    a)  During construction activities a several ton section of 18 inch thick brick wall was left unsupported and in danger of tipping and falling 30 feet to lower work areas.  The top and sides of the wall were removed to make room for new steel beams; employees were exposed to structural collapse hazard.     Location:  24 John Street, New York, N.Y.     On or about 4-20-2012     Note: the employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1):  the employer did not have a material safety data sheet (msds sheets) for each hazardous chemical, product, or material that employees may be exposed to, as required by the osha hazard communication standard:     a)  A material safety data sheet (msds) for silica hazard was not provided by  The employer when employees were doing extensive jackhammer / demolition of brick walls which causes masonry dust containing silica.     Location:  24 John Street, New York, N.Y.     On or about 4-20-2012     Note: the employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):  the employer did not provide employees with effective information and training, as required by the osha hazard communication standard, about any health and safety hazards for chemicals, products, or materials employees use or may be exposed to:     a)  Training for health hazards of silica was not provided to employees.  Employees were  Doing extensive jackhammer / demolition of brick walls which causes masonry dust   Containing silica.     Abatement note:  Hazard communication training (1200(h) includes:  (1)  identifies the hazardous chemicals, materials, or products present in the work area, and how to identify/ detect them.   (2) the physical and health hazards of chemicals, materials, products in the work area, use of labels, use of material safety data sheets (msds).  (3) the measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards such as; personal protective equipment (ppe), work practices, emergency procedures.   (4) explanation of the details of the hazard communication program and how to access this information.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.502 B06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
CFR 1926.502(b)(6):  guardrail systems were not so surfaced as to prevent injury to an employee from punctures or lacerations and to prevent snagging of clothing:    a)  Nail tips were sticking out of the wood guardrails of the center stairway (three instances near the bottom of the stair); employees were exposed to hand injury.     Location:  24 John Street, New York, N.Y.     On or about 4-20-2012     Note: BECAUSE ABATEMENT OF THIS VIOLATION IS ALREADY DOCUMENTED IN THE CASEFILE, THE EMPLOYER NEED NOT SUBMIT CERTIFICATION NOR DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT OF THIS VIOLATION AS NORMALLY REQUIRED BY 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View DUC CONSTRUCTION's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335713004.