Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HUGO GONZALEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HUGO GONZALEZ in 1330 SUNNYS HALO DRIVE, SUWANEE, GA 30024 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 335874103.

Watch Hugo Gonzalez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hugo Gonzalez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HUGO GONZALEZ
Site address
1330 SUNNYS HALO DRIVE
City
SUWANEE
State
GA
ZIP
30024
Mailing
1001 TREEHOUSE PARKWAY, NORCROSS, GA 30093
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a):     Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets.    On or about August 20, 2012: at 1330 Sunnys Halo Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    An employee framing a house was exposed to being struck by tools and materials that could fall from the employee working above him when the employee did not use a hard hat.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    On or about August 20, 2012, at 1330 Sunnys Halo Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    Three employees framing a house using nail guns, and saws were exposed to struck-by hazards from tools and materials while working without eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b)  On or about August 20, 2012, at 1330 Sunnys Halo Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    a) An employee decking a porch was exposed to a fall hazard that ranged from approximately 10.5-feet at the front of the porch to 12.8-feet at the rear of the porch. The employee did not use fall protection.     b) The above mentioned employee and the owner/crewleader working on the second floor of the house were exposed to a fall hazard from an approximately 7-foot by 13.4-foot unguarded floor opening that ranged from 9-feet to 10.4-feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2):     The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii)    On or about August 20, 2012, at 1330 Sunnys Halo Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    a) An employee decking the porch of a house was exposed to a fall hazard that ranged from approximately 10.5-feet from the front of the porch to approximately 12.8-feet at the rear of the porch. The employer did not train the employee to recognize and minimize fall hazards.     b) The above mentioned employee and the owner/crew leader were exposed to an unprotected floor opening that was approximately 7-feet by 13.4-feet and ranged from approximately 9-feet to 10.4-feet while working on the second floor.  The employee was not trained to recognize and minimize fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13):     The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:    On or about August 20, 2012, at 1330 Sunnys Halo Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    The owner/crew leader and an employee framing a house were exposed to a fall hazard that ranged from approximately 9-feet to 10.4-feet when they used the top step of a Werner 6-foot A-frame ladder to access and egress the second floor of the house.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, enabling each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.    On or about August 20, 2012, at 1330 Sunnys Halo Drive, Suwanee, Georgia:    An employee framing a house was exposed to a fall hazard that ranged from approximately 9-feet to 10.4-feet when he used a Werner A-frame ladder to access and egress the second floor. The employer did not train the employee how to recognize and minimize the hazards associated with using ladders on the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

View HUGO GONZALEZ's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 335874103.