OSHA Inspection: JUAN PIZANO

Issued

2012-11-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-26 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    At 9223 Dearborn St, Overland Park, KS, the employer had not developed a written hazard communication program to address chemicals used, such as roof adhesive, gasoline and asphalt shingles. Employees were exposed to health hazards such as dermatitis, chemical inhalation, and skin absorbtion.

Issued

2012-11-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-26 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    At 9223 Dearborn St, Overland Park, KS, the employer did not obtain and make available on the worksite material safety data sheets for chemicals used on site, such as gasoline, roof adhesive and asphalt shingles. Employees were exposed to health hazards such as dermatitis, chemical inhalation, and skin absorbtion.

Issued

2012-11-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-26 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    At jobsite located at 9223 Dearborn St, Overland Park, KS, an employee was working below overhead work without a hardhat.  Employee was exposed to struck by hazards.

Issued

2012-11-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2012-11-26 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     At 9223 Dearborn St, Overland Park, KS, employee(s) engaged in residential roofing, worked from a 6 in 12 and 8 in 12 sloped roof without fall protection, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 8 feet from the eave to the ground and concrete below.